We are soliciting your support to the statement, Easter Manifesto, a Passover Meditation for the Filipino People which was discussed and approved during the Lenten gathering and the participants had their name affix to the statement. 

---

1.      We are a people whose living faith has seen us through critical periods in our    history. Today, an even greater faith in a merciful God and in ourselves as a nation is   called for. Obstacles that in the past have blocked our path towards nationhood pale     in comparison with the amoral brutishness the relentless battering the Duterte regime is subjecting the moral fiber itself of our people. The indomitable spirit of the Filipino is under tremendous pressure. Political patronage is rampant. No institution of our democratic system and no well-meaning individual have been spared the smear of dirt the presidential snout untiringly spouts. Long standing traditions of propriety and good breeding have been set aside. Isinantabi ang delikadesang ating kinagisnan at pawang kagaspangan at kahalayan ang ipinaiiral. (That sense of decency upon which we were raised has been set aside; rudeness and obscenity have taken over.) The shady and secretive deals our economic and political leaders have entered into with foreign powers are compromising our sovereignty as a people.

No sector of Philippine society has been left unscathed and unmolested. The Filipina is disrespected. Not even a statue in honor of the misnamed and maligned “comfort women” has been left untouched. Children are by law (legal maneuvers!) rendered criminals and are unduly punished.

2.      We deplore the shame that has befallen us. We denounce the morally bankrupt leadership of Rodrigo Roa Duterte. We accuse him and his cohorts of unprecedented corruption, enriching themselves by exploiting the poorest of the land – indigenous communities, farmers, coconut growers, peasants, and laborers. They lie and cheat with impunity. They perpetuate dynasties that enable a few families to appropriate vast political and economic powers. They have prostituted our democratic and cultural values. They have betrayed our trust. They have stolen the future of the yet unborn Filipino by squandering at bargain prices our country’s natural resources.

Continue reading

‘The choice of law and the venue for disputes is once again surrendered by the Philippines in favor of China,’ senatorial bet Neri Colmenares tells Rappler

Ralf Rivas
Published 2:26 PM, March 24, 2019
Updated 2:53 PM, March 24, 2019

MANILA, Philippines– The Kaliwa Dam project, which seeks to prevent another water crisis in Metro Manila, is a magnet of controversy.

Already hounded by environmental and social concerns for decades, another issue surrounding the dam is a loan contract with China, which senatorial bet Neri Colmenares said was contentious.

“It is as onerous [as the Chico River irrigation project],” Colmenares told Rappler on Sunday, March 24.

The public can now go over the deal, as well as 8 other big-ticket infrastructure projects, after the Department of Finance (DOF) recently made public all loan agreements.

The Kaliwa Dam’s loan contract had articles pertaining to “waiver of immunity,” similar to the controversial Chico River irrigation project.

Colmenares said these were telltale signs of Beijing’s debt-trap diplomacy.

What is the project about? Located in Quezon province, the Kaliwa Dam is expected to supply some 600 million liters of water per day to Metro Manila. (READ: Manila Water on the hunt for new water sources)

The dam will be constructed by Beijing-run China Energy Engineering Corporation.

Several news reports stated that construction is targeted to start during the 3rd quarter of the year, and is expected to be completed by 2023.

Continue reading

24 MARCH 2019

On March 25, 2019, Monday, around four hundred (400) family members, children and supporters of the fifty three (53) locked out workers from Samahan ng mga Manggagawa sa Hanjin Shipyard (SAMAHAN), Workers for People’s Liberation (WPL) and Friends of Hanjin Workers (FHW) will gather at the Mehan Garden at 8:30AM and troop towards the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) Intramuros Office by 9:00AM to demand the return to work of locked out employees.

“Kahit nagkakasakit, naaaksidente at may posibilidad na mamatay gaya ng mga katrabaho naming naaksidente sa yarda, nagtiyaga kami at nagtrabaho ng maayos alang-alang sa aming mga pamilya. Ngayong nasa ilalim ng voluntary rehabilitation ang kompanya, kalabisan ba ang kahilingan naming manatili sa trabaho bilang maintenance sa yarda at isama kami hanggang sa muling pagbubukas nito?” lamented Efren Vinluan, SAMAHAN President.

Early this month, 113 of the 312 workers for shipyard maintenance were locked out of the worksite because they refused to sign the Voluntary Retrenchment Package (VRP) offered by the Hanjin management. The VRP stipulates a back-to-zero employment record, ‘five-month contracts’, as well as a quit claim form. Workers brought their plight to the Labor Department Sec. Silvestre Bello III, who said that the VRP is illegal, but refused to help bring the workers back to the shipyard.

Say work of activists will only get harder following withdrawal from international court

UCANews | Joe Torres, Manila, Philippines
March 18, 2019

The Philippines’ withdrawal from the International Criminal Court (ICC) has raised fears among activist groups of a worsening human rights situation amid an anti-narcotics war they say has killed more than 20,000 people in three years.

The Commission on Human Rights, an independent government body, called the withdrawal a “reversal of the country’s commitment to international treaty obligations and a step back from the gains the Philippines has achieved in promoting justice and human rights.”

In March last year, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte announced he was tearing up the Rome Statute, the treaty that created the ICC, after the Dutch-based tribunal announced it would initiate a preliminary crimes against humanity probe into Duterte’s “war on drugs.”

The ICC, however, announced that the Philippines’ withdrawal would not affect its preliminary examination, which covers incidents that took place since the start of the ant-narcotics campaign on July 1, 2016 and while the country remained a state party to the Rome Statute.

The Philippines ratified the statute on Aug. 30, 2011.

The Philippines’ withdrawal from the ICC took effect on March 17, a year after the government transmitted a notice of withdrawal to the office of the U.N. secretary-general in New York.

It is the second country to leave the court after Burundi withdrew in 2017.

Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo said the withdrawal poses a challenge to human rights activist to work harder in monitoring human rights abuses.

The prelate said he believes the court despite the withdrawal will still pursue the cases filed against Duterte.

The ICC is currently evaluating 52 cases that alleged the Philippine president committed crimes against humanity.”

Human rights group Karapatan warned the statute withdrawal “may signal another wave of intensified attacks against human rights defenders.”

The group’s deputy secretary-general, Roneo Clamor, said that even when being part of the ICC, activists and rights advocates who sought to expose state-perpetrated violations were increasingly being threatened and killed.

“With a vindictive government, all should be wary of Duterte’s acts of severe reprisals,” said Clamor.

On March 18, the presidential palace downplayed the Philippines’ withdrawal from the ICC, saying, “the sky has not fallen and the sun still rises in the east.”

Lawyer Salvador Panelo, the president’s spokesman, said the criticisms of the withdrawal raised by human rights groups and Duterte critics were “misleading and baseless.”

He challenged critics to instead file cases in court “to test the validity of their assertions.”

“There is no culture of impunity under this administration,” said Panelo, adding that the criminal justice system continues to be “operational and strictly compliant with the constitutional requirement of due process.”

He said reported “extrajudicial killings” linked to Duterte’s “war on drugs” were not state-sponsored.

In an earlier statement, the ICC said dumping the Rome Statute is a sovereign decision that has “no impact on ongoing proceedings or any matter that was already under consideration by the court prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective.”

The ICC, established in 2002, is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal that sits in The Hague in the Netherlands. It has the jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression.

Former addict turned priest refuses to let intimidation prevent him helping drug users, victims of drug-related killings

UCANews | Marielle Lucenio
Manila, Philippines, March 15, 2019

In the Philippines, where admission to having a history of drug addiction can mean a bullet in the head rather than a stay in a rehabilitation center, drug dependents have chosen silence.

For Divine Word priest Flaviano Villanueva, however, his past has become a narrative that keeps him going in his mission to serve.

In 1995, before he entered the priesthood, he hit rock bottom after a “short period” of substance abuse. It became a new beginning, he said.

“The catalyst need not always be the bright side of things,” he said. For him, it was when he realized that his drug taking was getting the best of him as a person.

He said his relationships were then crumbling. “Nothing was going well for me. I felt that there was more to life than sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll,” he said. 

The moment of discernment prompted the future missionary priest to look for the meaning of life far from what he was used to.

“I told myself that I would go cold turkey, but if it didn’t work then I would subject myself to professional help,” he said.

Eventually, however, it worked for him “with God’s grace.”

He decided to leave his home in the Philippine capital and went to the provinces where he worked as a lay missionary.

In the middle of the “realities of life” in the villages, Father Villanueva found himself at a crossroads where he opted to enter the convent.

In 2006, the former drug addict became a priest.

After ten years as a missionary priest he established a center in 2015 to help Manila’s street dwellers.

The St. Arnold Janssen Kalinga Center became his way of responding and providing “something more concrete and better” to alleviate the lives of the poor.

The center aims to recreate and empower lives by offering food and a clean shower to the homeless.

“The second phase is about reclaiming their self-respect,” said Father Villanueva, adding that the center’s “clients” are given the opportunity to study.

This phase, he said, is offering a livelihood and employment “to help restore their self-worth.”

“As one goes through this process, one is able to realize that there is life beyond the streets,” explained the priest.

Father Villanueva recalled a story, one of many that he has encountered in his work.

One Sunday, a person approached the priest after Mass and handed him a card. The priest politely refused, thinking that the man was trying to sell him something.

“Father, I’m not here to sell you anything,” said the man.

“I’m just giving you my calling card to let you know that I was here for six months, following, falling in line, eating and taking a bath, listening to you,” the man added.

“Now I’m an assistant supervisor. This is my card to prove that I am already employed, and I am here to thank you.”

Not all visits to the center, however, are as pleasant as that of the grateful man.

Continue reading

 Friday, 15 March 2019

When will the killings stop? When can we get reprieve from fear? How can we not be alarmed when even those whom we turn and depend on to for help, are being threatened and killed? Not only human rights defenders, but even the bishops, priests, nuns, and lawyers who are fulfilling their mission to help the most poor and deprived.

Our heart bleeds as another pro-poor lawyer has fallen victim to a scheme of unabated killing and impunity. We, at Philipine Misereor Partnership Inc. (PMPI) denounces this treacherous killing of Atty. Rex Jasper Lopoz. We mourn for losing another protector of people without voices.

Yesterday morning, March 14, Atty. Rex Jasper Lopoz was shot at the back while trying to board his vehicle parked at City Mall in Tagum, Davao. He was brought to the Bishop Reagan Hospital by his companion who thought he suffered from heart attack only to find out later on that a gunshot wound caused his death.

A People’s Lawyer

In 2009, in an article profiling Atty. Rex Jasper Lopoz, he was described as someone who came from the ranks of a common tao. Before becoming a lawyer, he did various odd jobs so he can support his family and finish his studies. From hawking cigarettes, becoming a kristo in a cockpit, helping in kitchenettes while doing his research work and thesis. He went through all these so his family can survive and he can become a lawyer.

Having lived the life of ordinary people, he devoted his time as a lawyer to finding justice for the poor and marginalized. He handled a flurry of cases that dealt with farmers woes,  workers demand for fair wages, illegal arrests and extra judicial killings.

His death adds to the increasing number of lawyers dying for a cause. Statistics show that there were already 35 members in the judiciary who have died under the Duterte regime, not to mention the more than 20,000 number of people killed due to drug war, 3 priests, 12 journalists, and 48 environmental defenders as per the Global Witness Report in 2017.

We Seek Justice

The families of victims seeks out reasons for the sudden and tragic death of their loved ones and for those who are behind their deaths. Closure and acceptance can only come when families finally get justice. Culprits should be held accountable and penalized, lest, discontent and dissent among the people will continue to grow.

Thus, we appeal to authorities to investigate the death of Atty. Lopoz, whose life spent among the ordinary people have made him a true People’s Lawyer. Let not his death become another additional number to thousands of unsolved cases of killings. Indeed, in a our situation where impunity and violence have become the norm, and has become the State’s policy, no one is safe in the Philippines. Not even those living in Davao whom the President boasts as the most peaceful place in the Philippines.

Vigilance at All Times

We encourage vigilance among us, citizens.  Let not the killings be the norm in our society. Let us not turn our backs from the core of our humanity, that which to uphold life. We can’t just kill people because we differ in beliefs. We can’t annihilate them because one has committed a sin, mistake or a crime. All should have a forum to explain and redeem one’s self. All should be given space to live, grow and perform his or her role to the fullest possible. Only in this environment that good can triumph. Not in an intolerant, misogynistic, egotistic system that those in power are spousing.

These are confusing and dreadful times, more vicious than the brutal realities perpetrated by the Dictator Marcos, but there should be no room for waning commitments. The movement to stop violence and deter evil must be carried forward with deep prayers, tough faith, and overflowing hope that good shall prevail if we work for it. With in mind, believe that we could move mountains.

‘By Showing His Glory, Jesus Assures Us that the Cross, the Trials, the Difficulties, in which We Find Ourselves, Have their Solution in Easter’

March 17, 2019 14:58 Virginia Forrester Angelus/Regina Caeli

Here is a translation of the address Pope Francis gave March 17, 2019, before and after praying the midday Angelus with those gathered in St. Peter’s Square.

Before the Angelus:

Dear Brothers and Sisters, good morning!

In this Second Sunday of Lent, the liturgy has us contemplate the event of the Transfiguration, in which Jesus grants the disciples Peter, James, and John to taste the glory of the Resurrection: a bit of Heaven on earth. The evangelist Luke (Cf. 9:28-36) shows us Jesus transfigured on the mountain, which is the place of light, fascinating symbol of the singular experience reserved to the three disciples. They go up the mountain with the Master, they see Him immerse Himself in prayer and, at a certain point, “the appearance of his countenance was altered” (v. 29). Used to seeing Him daily in the simple semblance of His humanity, in the face of this new splendor, which also envelops His whole person, they remain astonished. And Moses and Elijah appear next to Jesus, who speak with Him about His coming “exodus,” namely of His Paschal Death and Resurrection. It’s an anticipation of Easter. Then Peter exclaims: “Master, it is well that we are here” (v. 33). He wanted that moment of grace to be endless!

The Transfiguration happens at a very precise moment of Christ’s mission, namely, after He confided to the disciples that He would have “to suffer many things, [. . . ] be killed and on the third day be raised” (v. 21). Jesus knows that they don’t accept this reality — the reality of the cross, the reality of Jesus’ death –, and so He wants to prepare them to endure the scandal of <His> Passion and death on the cross, so that they know that this is the way through which the heavenly Father will have His Son attain to glory, resurrecting Him from the dead. And this will also be the way of the disciples: no one attains eternal life without following Jesus, without carrying one’s cross in earthly life. Each one of us has his/her own cross. The Lord makes us see the end of this course, which is Resurrection, beauty, after carrying one’s cross.

Therefore, Christ’s Transfiguration shows us the Christian perspective of suffering. Suffering isn’t sadomasochism: it’s a necessary but transitory passage. The point of arrival to which we are called is luminous as Christ’s transfigured countenance: in Him is salvation, beatitude, light and endless love of God. By showing His Glory in this way, Jesus assures us that the cross, the trials, the difficulties in which we find ourselves have their solution and their overcoming in Easter. Therefore, in this Lent, let us also go up the mountain with Jesus! But how? With prayer, we go up the mountain with prayer: silent prayer, heartfelt prayer, prayer that always seeks the Lord. We stay for a few moments in recollection, a bit every day, we fix our interior gaze on His face and we let His light pervade us and radiate in our life.

In fact, the evangelist Luke stresses that Jesus was transfigured “as He was praying” (v. 29). He was immersed in an intimate conversation with the Father, in which the Law and the Prophets also resounded — Moses and Elijah — and while He adhered with all His being to the Father’s Will of Salvation, including the cross, the glory of God invaded Him transpiring also outside. It’s so, brothers and sisters, the prayer in Christ and in the Holy Spirit transforms the person from inside and can illumine others and the surrounding world. How many times we have met persons that illumine, who emanate light from the eyes, who have that luminous look! They pray, and prayer does this: it makes us luminous with the light of the Holy Spirit.

We continue our Lenten itinerary with joy. We give space to prayer and to the Word of God, which the liturgy proposes abundantly to us in these days. May the Virgin Mary teach us to stay with Jesus even when we don’t understand Him and comprehend Him because only by remaining with Him we will see His glory.

BULATLAT
Marya Salamat  March 7, 2019 

3rd Part in a Series of 3 (DENR in mock Battle for Manila Bay rehab?)

“If anyone had rights over the Manila Bay, it is the Filipino people, and if it is to serve any purpose, it should be for the benefit of the general population, and not an elite few.” — Makabayan lawmakers

MANILA — Bucking threats from local government leaders and intermittent military “visibility” in their communities, members of the fisherfolk communities in Bulacan have protested the proposed reclamation affecting their homes and fishing grounds. “Buo sa isip ko, kaya namin lumaban (I’m entirely sure in my mind that we can oppose this),” fisherwoman and spokesperson of Network Opposed to Reclamation in Bulacan Monica Anastacio, 63, told Bulatlat in Filipino.

They have questioned since last year what they considered as initial steps to reclamation, the massive cutting of mangrove trees serving San Miguel Corporation’s proposal to do away with their communities and build an international airport on today’s river and villages. Despite the support to this project by their local government officials, they organized a Network Opposed to the Aerotropolis and Reclamation in Bulacan on October 2018.

With support of their fishermen, the women comprised the network’s unanimous choice as spokespersons to help convene the rest of the affected villagers for the defense of the bay, and to represent them as well in dialogues or forum in the mainland. They launched the campaign to #SaveTaliptip in early 2018.

Supported by the multisectoral Alyansa para sa Pagtatanggol ng Kabuhayan, Paninirahan at Kalikasan sa Manila Bay (AKAP KA-Manila Bay), the Bulacan fisherfolk launched a petition against reclamation since late 2018.  They sent delegations to various pickets and dialogues held at the national headquarters of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). They spoke at peoples’ conferences on climate change, on land use and food security.

“Malaking kawalan sa lahat pag pumayag tayo tabunan,” (It will be a huge loss for everyone if we agree to reclamation) a priest from the Bulacan Ecumenical Forum who grew up catching fish and seafood in Taliptip told a gathering of residents in Taliptip.

The communities in Taliptip are united not just in protecting the mangroves but also in opposing moves to displace the fisherfolk in favor of a private company’s reclamation, according to Monica Anastacio, a resident of Taliptip for over 50 years. To them it is not just a call for saving their homes or sources of livelihoods for themselves. They believe other Filipinos in the mainland also stand to lose when the mangroves and the relatively affordable sources of nutritious fish and seafood are buried under concrete.

She has worked with her family in Taliptip saltbeds since she was in grade school. When the salt farms stopped operation in 1990s, she and her husband turned to fishing. The women in these coastal communities are used to working with their husbands, from the saltfarms of decades ago to today’s fishing.

While fishing is traditionally a male occupation in the Philippines, it is not uncommon to see women at work, too, setting traps (for crabs), casting nets, rowing the family’s banca, or selling the fish catch. Some women also go down to the river or out on the bay to catch fish. Some wade into the muddy, shallow loam to catch crabs. These days they add to their responsibilities of taking care of their household and family various tasks toward network-building to turn the rehabilitation of river and the bay to the people’s favor.

Their background of being saltfarmers and fisherfolk speaks of how much food the areas where they live now have contributed and could further contribute to the country’s food needs.

The coastal communities in Bulakan were major contributors to the country’s salt sufficiency for decades. Until 1990s, Bulacan was producing more than a hundred metric tons of salt, equivalent to more than half the country’s needs. That is, until a combination of the impact of climate change and trade liberalization began eroding the industry to a pale shadow of itself at present. Nowadays, the fisherfolk group Pamalakaya says the government’s approval of reclamation projects also threatens the country’s food security, along with other policies that ultimately shrink the fishing grounds and mangroves and remove the fisherfolk from the coasts.

Facing the threat of displacement due to reclamation, the women of Bulakan are facilitating their organizing and network formation for an organized response. Now they are also finding time to ride their bancas and visit their neighboring fishing communities in hopes of strengthening their network opposing the reclamation of their coastal villages.

Asked why it is the women frequently being sent to represent the fisherfolk in outside forum and dialogues, they replied that the menfolk are working with them and supportive, but the tasks of representation can be squeezed along with their other duties such as taking care of the household, selling the fish catch and procuring supplies.

Threats Not only in Bulacan but along entire Manila Bay

What is threatening to happen in Bulakan and neighboring coastal towns is happening under similar projects around the Philippines, said Jam Pinpin, public information officer of Pamalakaya.

A total of 43 reclamation projects covering more than 32, 000 hectares are pending throughout the 194, 400-hectare Manila Bay, based on record obtained by Pamalakaya from the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA).

In Bulacan the SMC has won over the local government executives. Even as it has yet to conclude a concession agreement with the government (for the proposed airport), its subcontractors are already at work readying the ground for reclamation.  It is now at the final stages in the process of securing an ECC (Environmental Compliance Certificate) that will pave the way to reclamation of over 2,500 hectares. It was suspected to have been behind the massive cutting of old-growth mangroves in April 2018. This month as we write, the residents of nearby villages of Obando posted in Save Taliptip’s social media account that strangers were knocking on their doors asking them the sizes of their house and telling them they will have to leave soon.

In Manila, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) announced last week it will start  dredging in the Baywalk area of the Roxas Boulevard in March, saying it is part of the ongoing rehabilitation drive of Manila Bay.

But national fisherfolk group Pamalakaya warned that the targeted area for dredging also happens to be the area where the 148-hectare Manila Solar City reclamation project that will occupy 3.5 kilometers of Manila Bay’s shoreline will be located.

It brings a bitter déjà vu to the fisherfolk leader. He recalled that shortly before the SM Mall of Asia and Entertainment City establishments in Roxas Boulevard began construction years before, there was also some dredging work that resulted to the displacement of more than 6,000 fishing and urban poor families.

In Cavite, a province south of Manila, the coastal villages of mainly fisherfolk are also in a constant battle to save their community and livelihood. At least four reclamation projects covering hundreds to thousands of hectares of Cavite coastlines are being processed by the Philippine Reclamation Authority.

Unlike in Bulacan where the Manila Bay is still bounded by an expanse of alternating shallow loam/islets, a network of rivers and patches of mangroves, in Cavite, only a thin stretch of the shore remains between the bank that has been cemented for road and real estate development and the Manila Bay. Living on what’s left of this narrow shore the fisherfolk communities organized under Pamalakaya have been protesting reclamation and their demolition. They have suffered at least four incidences of suspected arson.

In advancing their defense of the bay, they pointed to documents from the government’s Environmental Management Bureau (EMB) itself state that the reclamation projects will have ecological impacts in Manila Bay.

It says that throughout the construction of the various projects, contaminants from dredged sediments will be released, deplete dissolved oxygen, and destroy natural habitats of sardines and mangroves found in Manila Bay.  Once finished, the projects will interfere with the natural tide flow of water in the area and erode the shoreline of nearby beaches. The erosion could cause flooding in nearby low-lying areas especially during a typhoon.

Worse flooding has also been recorded in coastal towns of Bulacan since the reclamation of Manila Bay. The fisherfolk group Pamalakaya urged the government to take heed of its own environmental bureau’s assessment.

Based on the assessment of environmentalists and fisherfolk, the government’s ‘Battle for Manila Bay’ is turning out to be another mock battle for rehabilitation.

“With the recent actions of administration such as justifying reclamation projects and the abrupt issuance of Executive Order 74, or the taking over of the power to approve such projects and command of the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA), “Manila Bay rehabilitation” is becoming synonymous to “Manila Bay reclamation,” said Anakpawis party-list Rep. Ariel Casilao.

Environment Secretary Frank Cimatu denied this just this week. But around the same time he was saying these to reporters, Manila Mayor Joseph Estrada was defending and even extolling the reclamation projects.

Anakpawis’ Casilao said all these are a serving as a challenge for the people to advance a genuine rehabilitation of Manila Bay.

“If anyone had rights over the Manila Bay, it is the Filipino people, and if it is to serve any purpose, it should be for the benefit of the general population, and not an elite few,” read a part of the explanatory note when the Makabayan bloc of partylist lawmakers filed this February 7 the House Bill 9067 declaring Manila Bay as Reclamation-free Zone.

The proposed law criticized not only the duplicity in the Duterte administration’s conduct of “rehabilitating” Manila Bay – Anakpawis Partylist said it’s just a façade for facilitating reclamation and taking the bay away from the people. After years of previous reclamation, the ordinary people’s access now to the famed Manila Bay has been reduced to a few kilometers near Rajah Sulayman – and even there the poor are banned from swimming.

In Cavite, Pamalakaya’s Hicap rued said what used to be miles of cheap sources of clams and mussels are now concrete roads that could have been built elsewhere.

Makabayan lawmakers from Anakpawis, Bayan Muna, Gabriela, ACT and Kabataan Partylist traced how, through years of previous reclamation, “Development” along Manila Bay, has wiped out the mangrove ecosystem, from as broad as 54,000 hectares at the turn of the 20th century, to a measly 794 hectares in 1995.

“Companies destroy mangroves because they saw no profit in maintaining it,” the Makabayan lawmakers said. And after reclamation the ordinary citizens also lose access to what remains of the bay.

“It is as clear as the blue sky of Manila Bay’s horizon that reclamation has deprived the people of public access,” Makabayan said in seeking to declare Manila Bay as reclamation-free zone.

Last February 22, a broad alliance and watchdog for genuine rehabilitation and against reclamation projects was launched in Malate Church near the last remaining free baywalk in Manila Bay. The watchdog seeks to garner support to declaring Manila Bay as a “reclamation-free” zone.

They hope that with the proposed law in Congress and the people’s movement and campaigns, they can refute any ruse of any group or even by the government “that worships profit at the cost of undermining the people’s aspiration for a sincerely-rehabilitated, restored and preserved Manila Bay.