This is a very important document prepared by academicians and professors on amending the constitution. It is only a 3-5 min read. It just looks long because of the list of names of those who have penned this.

Please take the time to get involved. Our nation’s future is at stake, affecting not only our present generations but also the next, and the next, and the next, and the next…

We, the undersigned academics and professionals, are expressing our deep concern as regards the process of reviewing and possibly amending our Constitution.

We acknowledge the importance of discussing ways to improve governance in the country, particularly when it comes to a possible shift to a new, federal form of government. Some of us actually support federalism, while others oppose it. We have nevertheless united in this common statement to acknowledge the importance of evidence-based debate and discussion to root out the main benefits and costs of such a reform.

Given the far-reaching implications of this reform, we believe the process must be much more participatory—including not just those who are for this reform, but also those who oppose it. International policy experience and evidence suggests that constitutional reforms are more effective if deliberations are front-loaded at the crafting stage, rather than belatedly appended once these reforms are already ratified.

The present environment is not conducive to reforming the constitution. The most recent nationwide surveys of SWS and Pulse Asia last March 2018 show that only 25% of our citizens sufficiently understand our existing constitution, while only 37% support the shift to federalism. 64% are against charter change.. ‘Changing the Constitution’ also ranked last in the ‘most urgent national concerns’ with only 3% of the Filipinos saying that it should be acted upon immediately.

We do not support calls to channel this reform through a Constituent Assembly.

Almost 80% of Congress is comprised of political dynasties, and the empirical evidence suggests that a majority of them may face deep conflict of interest if a new constitution aims for reforms that level the political playing field. The risk of capture by vested interests affecting our present politics is too great.

We do not support calls to postpone or cancel elections in 2019.

Finally, we believe that there are more pressing and immediate policy challenges that our leaders must address. The rising death toll linked to the anti-drugs campaign, which now includes many children and young people. The killings of political leaders and priests also further raise the spectre of injustice. Rising prices of basic commodities, transportation and other needs are also hitting the poor, our workers, and millions of low income households. If these are unresolved, then how can we credibly unite around “rule of law” and “human rights” under an amended constitution?

A constitution is supposed to bind our nation in common values and a shared vision. It is the very glue that should unite us all in common purpose.. If we are to amend the constitution, we must invest not just in the outcome, but in the very process.

This is a broad discussion that must bring together our citizens from all walks of life, professions and political leanings. It is a national discourse that must allay fears, clarify concerns and bring us all towards common ground.

Signed:

Fr. Roberto C. Yap, SJ, President, Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan

Fr. Roberto E. N.. Rivera, SJ, President, Ateneo de Naga University

Fr. Karel San Juan, SJ, President, Ateneo de Zamboanga University

Fr. Primitivo E. Viray, Jr., SJ, Provincial Superior, Jesuits in the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus

Br. Armin A. Luistro, FSC, President, De La Salle Philippines

Fr. Dionisio M. Miranda, SVD, President, University of San Carlos

Edilberto de Jesus, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Asian Institute of Management   Continue reading

Dear Friends,

Greetings of peace!

On July 23, President Rodrigo Duterte will deliver his third State of the Nation Address (SONA) before the joint session of Congress. The SONA has always been an opportune time for our people to reflect on the country’s situation and to air their various concerns and grievances.

Indeed, during these uncertain times, when our fragile democracy is once more under threat of authoritarian rule, when human rights are violated with impunity, when the EJK list continues to rise, when national sovereignty is being bartered away, when the economy is wracked by soaring prices, low wages and unemployment, and when peace and justice have become more elusive than ever, President Duterte is diverting our attention by railroading charter change via Constituent Assembly.

It is our Christian duty in a democratic society to stand firm and say “Enough!”, and make a prophetic call for genuine transformation.

In this light, we are inviting you to a peaceful yet powerful protest rally on July 23, 3-6pm along Commonwealth Ave., QC, fronting the St. Peter’s Parish Church. The Coalition for Justice will join several thousands of people representing the broadest spectrum of religious beliefs, political persuasions and sectoral interests, coming from more than 100 churches, faith-based organizations, sectoral and cause-oriented groups in a Unity March that will start from UP Diliman Campus at 2p.m., passing by various assembly points along Commonwealth Ave. to the rally site.

We invited Former CJ Maria Lourdes Sereno to speak on Charter Change during the event.

If you intend to join the Unity March and the rally, please respond to this email and indicate your group/organization, how many people from your group you expect to join, and which assembly point you intend to proceed to on July 23.

This would be the perfect time for the President, Congress and the whole nation to see and hear our various organizations, sectors and movements united in the struggle to uphold democracy, human rights, peace, and justice. We hope you can join us.

Thank you very much.

Ptr. CALOY DIÑO
Lead Convenor
Coalition for Justice

July 20, 2018

---

ASSEMBLY POINTS | Organizations in charge:

• Diliman Preparatory Academy| 1PM – ACT Teachers and PUP community
• Robinsons, Commonwealth (cor. Tandang Sora) |12NN – BabaeAko
• UP University Avenue | 12NN – BAYAN, MAT
• Luzon/Tandang Sora | 1PM – BAYAN QC, QC Urban Poor Network
• Ever Gotesco | Intercessors for the Philippines
• St. Peter Parish Church | 1:30PM Mass – Tindig Pilipinas, Sangguniang Laiko, Promotion of Church People’s Response, National Clergy Discernment Group, Task Force Orientation of Church Personnel, Task Force on Urban Conscientization of the Association of Major Religious Superiors of the Philippines, Rural Missionaries of the Philippines, Nicodemus, Rise UP, Justice Peace and Integrity of Creation Pilipinas
• Toyota Center, Commonwealth | 12:30PM – Laban ng Masa, iDefend, Freedom from Debt Coalition, Green Thumb Coalition
• 1PM – Kalipunan ng mga Kilusang Masa, Coalition for Justice

By Roy Lagarde
July 19, 2018
Manila, Philippines

A Catholic bishop has condemned the murder of a drug war widow who was leading a support group for families of victims of extrajudicial killings.

Bishop Pablo Virgilio David of Kalookan said Jennifer Taborada, 27 and a mother of two young children, was gunned down by masked killers in Caloocan City at around 8pm on Wednesday.

As shepherd of a diocese that has become a “killing field”, the bishop said he is saddened that he cannot protect his flock from the “wolves”.

“And so today in utter shame and frustration I declare I have not been a good shepherd to my flock,” David lamented in his homily during a Mass for the Philippine Conference on New Evangelization in Manila on Thursday.

“The wolves, they have been prowling the streets and alleys of Caloocan, Malabon, and Navotas for almost two years now! They have killed hundreds already, and I am unable to protect them with my life.”

“I will bow in shame if the Good Shepherd will denounce me as a mere hireling who remains very safe and very secure, who can get a good night’s sleep in his warm bed while his sheep are being slaughtered. And this is what i was saying in tears to myself last night,” he said.

Citing a report from his informant who was at the crime scene, the prelate said what’s appalling was the killers were not even rushing and just took their “sweet time”.

He claimed that the police seemed to be alerted about presence of the killers “because they are not supposed to meddle”.

“If the police wanted to pursue them, they could have, because they stayed for more than three hours,” David said.

After the killing of Taborada, he said that the killers just moved a few blocks and killed Alvin Teng, 36, at around 11:30pm.

He recalled that Taborada was one of the widows who applied for a scholarship for her kids just a few months ago.

“At that time I remember how she narrated her husband’s death, how Ryan was mutilated by the killers. He had to be abducted and tortured first. They gouged his eyes and cut off his private parts,” added David.

“Now her two little children aged five and seven, named Princess and Prince, are complete orphans,” he also said.

The Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas (LAIKO) believes that the 1987 Constitution is founded on reverence to God, democracy and social justice. Therefore, in unity with all Filipinos who are freedom-loving and defenders of truth, we strongly oppose the Charter Change. We do not believe in the timeliness of the process and its lack of transparency because we are witnesses to a House of Representatives that acts as puppets of a totalitarian executive.   We do not believe in the proposal to adopt a federal form of government that would apparently guarantee a fairer distribution of resources among the regions, more participation in the political process and a better life for all, yet giving vast powers to President Duterte between 2019-2022, and impose more taxes on the people to support new structures and officials.

Based on the March 2018 Pulse Asia Survey the number of Filipinos opposed to Charter change went up from 44 percent in July 2016 to 64 % in March 2018, and the opposition to federalism went the same way, except by a larger margin from 33 percent to 66 percent. (1) LAIKO therefore joins this growing number of Filipinos to call on our legislators in Congress to STOP CHA-CHA. Instead we urge them to:

• craft enabling laws that will fully implement the provisions of the 1987 Constitution especially on the Freedom of Information and the Anti-Dynasty Law.
• make the wider consultation process in the country for the Filipinos to fully understand the effects of tampering with the 1987 Constitution
• call for a constitutional convention wherein the different sectors of society are represented and in a democratic venue express their stand without being afraid for their life.

Continue reading

Duterte’s Strongman Rule: The Gathering Storm?
A CenPEG Public Forum will be moved to July 24, 2018. Venue toi be announced. Apologies for the late update.

The policy think tank, Center for People Empowerment in Governance (CenPEG), is holding its 10th State of the Presidency (SOP) – entitled “Duterte’s Strongman Rule: The Gathering Storm?” – on July 18, 2018, 8:30 a.m. -12 noon, Assembly Hall of the National College of Public Administration and Governance (NCPAG), University of the Philippines, Diliman campus, Quezon City.

Bulatlat Contributors July 15, 2018

“Workers are no longer hoping for a favorable action from the government to respect their dignity.”

Part 1 of 2: Strikes, Protests erupt against worsening contractualization, wage

By ADAM ANG and MENCHANI TILENDO
Bulatlat.com

MANILA — In the two years that President Duterte has been in power, two government regulations on contractualization have been released – the DOLE Department Order (DO) No. 174 and Executive Order (EO) No. 51. But most workers say these did not respond to their problems, resulting in the persistent eruption of labor disputes.

In the past two years, at least 25 workers’ protest actions and strikes have been launched, all traceable to the problem of contractualization. Of these strikes, those monitored by the labor center Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) were disputes due to regularization, union-busting and illegal job termination.

Kilos Na Manggagawa (KNM) chairperson Jen Pajel told Bulatlat that workers’ rights are being suppressed. “Contractualization brings distress to workers and their families.”

“In the factories, a contractual worker has no permanent livelihood, wages are low, and working conditions are unsafe.”

Finding these intolerable, some Filipino workers have launched strikes and protests.

But in the strike area, most workers are being harassed by the company they used to serve. Last June 14, the picket in Bulacan of NutriAsia workers was forcibly dispersed by the police. On July 3, in Laguna, the police and security elements also forcibly entered the Middleby factory in Laguna to dislodge the workers from their sit-down strike. For days before that, the striking workers’ food support had been barred from entering the Laguna Technopark where the workers were on strike.

Aside from launching strikes, workers have launched boycott campaigns to further raise their calls for regularization, direct employment relations with the principal, and wage increase. Laid-off workers of NutriAsia and Jolibee have asked consumers to boycott NutriAsia and Jollibee products.

“Boycotts are one of the weapons of the workers to push the capitalists and even those in DOLE to take concrete actions,” Pajel said.

Circumventing labor laws

 

Amid the strengthening calls for regularization and national minimum wage, the deliberate disregard of companies and establishments have intensified the labor disputes in the country.

In Nutriasia, over half of its workforce, or no less than 900 workers, have remained contractuals despite working in the same company for more than a decade.

In the Pangilinan-led PLDT (Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company), about 7,000 workers have been demanding for regularization for almost two years now. The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) rejected the telecommunication company’s request to reverse the decision on regularizing its workers. Instead, it gave PLDT 10 days to process its compliance order.

“The compliance order has been issued to PLDT since 2016 but until now, it is one of the top companies in the country that practices illegal contracting. Based on our initial inspection, we have discovered that the company has been illegally contracting almost 9,000 workers. Time and again, we have ordered them to undergo mandatory conferences and regularize their workers”, DOLE Undersecretary Joel Maglunsod said in an interview.

PLDT is one of the country’s biggest, if not the biggest, telecommunication companies. Aside from it, 3,337 companies in the country have been identified by the Labor Department as practicing illegal contracting. These include big-brand companies such as the Jollibee Foods Corporation, Monde Nissin, Unipak Sardines, Middleby Corporation.

The Labor Department has seen that labor laws are being violated and the workers who render services for more than six (6) months remain contractuals without benefits.

“Our compliance order is inclusive not only of the regularization of thousands of the workers, but the refunding of their underpayments, salary deductions and other benefits. It should guarantee them their rights to unionize, collective bargaining, security of tenure, strike in accordance to the laws, and right to just and living wages. For numerous times, the department has already called for exit conferences to make this clear among employers, contractors, agencies, and workers”, Maglunsod said.

As for PLDT, DOLE has issued a cease and desist order to PLDT’s service contract providers, but instead of providing relief to the workers, it’s now a justification being made by the telco for poor quality service.

“They (companies) have been skirting the laws. Now they want to pin down DOLE, and claim that it was our fault. What we want is for them to comply with the law, because the workers are the ones at stake here,” Maglunsod said.

“PLDT, Jollibee, Nutriasia, and other companies that have long been practicing illegal contracting have circumvented the laws, beyond what are stated in the Labor code. The main principle is clear; if the company directly hired the workers, then they shouldn’t be transferred to agencies and other contractors. Doing so is illegal”, Maglunsod concuded. (http://bulatlat.com)

Part 2 of 2: Philippines ‘worst’ for workers – global report

 

By ADAM ANG and MENCHANI TILENDO Bulatlat.com

MANILA — The Philippines was among the top 10 countries across the globe to be worst for workers, according to the Global Rights Index for 2018 released last June 8 by the International Trade Union Confederation. In a scale of 1 to 5, the Philippines is a 5 with “no guarantee of rights due to the breakdown of law.

The local labor rights group Center for Trade Union and Human Rights (CTUHR) said the report “re-validated” their findings that the “Duterte administration is no different from the previous governments or even worse in its attacks against the rights of Filipino workers.”

CTUHR recorded 29 victims of extrajudicial killings in the labor sector from June 2016 to March 2018. About 3,345 individuals whose labor rights have been violated were documented by the CTUHR in 133 cases. These include “809 victims of red-tagging, 358 victims of threat, harassments and intimidation and 98 victims of arbitrary arrest and detention resulting from filing trumped up criminal charges.”

Dissent and protests, however, remain the labor sector’s recourse amid unresolved jobs crisis, contractualization and low wages.

After President Rodrigo Duterte’s contractualization order on May 1, labor groups have boldly criticized the administration’s move and described it as nothing but a ‘tokenistic’ approach to the long-time issues of contractualization in the country.

“Contractualization is getting even worse because of the continuous foreign investments in the country which the government allows to implement contractualization. Because of this, they (the companies) are free to create mechanisms to exploit the Filipino workers,” Joel Maglunsod, a Labor Undersecretary who was once also a labor leader, told Bulatlat.

Maglunsod also admitted that Duterte’s DO 174 did not differ with the existing labor laws on labor-only contracting. “In essence, it only prohibits agencies to engage in illegal contracting, but it could not supersede the existing laws that allow contracting and subcontracting.”

Maglunsod defended the Labor Department for its lackluster performance in the promised banning of contractualization.

“We have submitted a workers’ version of demands to the president, even before he signed the executive order last Labor Day. It is beyond the department’s accountability if the president did not align his version with that of the workers,’” , the labor undersecretary explained.

The Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) and other labor rights’ groups have criticized DOLE’s action, calling it a mere ‘lip service.’ The labor center said they have had enough of nearly a decade of the Labor Department’s “disregard and incompetence when it comes to the employees’ calls for regularization.”

Still the same calls uniting labor: ‘Junk government laws on contracting, subcontracting’

 

According to the contractual workers’ alliance KNM (Kilos Na Manggagawa), the so-called “legal contractualization” or any employment of contractual workers is actually illegal.

“Any form of contractualization, whether seasonal, project-based or casual, whatever it is called, as long as you are considered contractual, it is illegal,” said KNM chairperson Jen Pajel.

Despite hyping his administration’s thrust to end ENDO (end of contract signifying contractualization), the contractualization policies issued by the Duterte government continue the old policies’ distinction between legal and illegal contractualization. On March 16, 2017, Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello III issued the DO No. 174 providing for stricter guidelines on contracting and subcontracting. It does not ban contractualization; it just banned labor-only contracting or “an arrangement where the contractor or subcontractor merely recruits, supplies, or places workers to perform a job, work, or service for a principal.”

On Labor Day this year, President Duterte signed the EO No. 51 which banned illegal contractualization schemes like end-of-contract. Labor groups were quick to denounce the gesture as “nonsense.”

KMU said in a statement that the order does not end all forms of contractualization but legalizes it. They also consider it to be worse than DO 174 as it sets labor contracting through agencies as the standard for employment in the country.

“Whatever kind of position and livelihood, all should be considered as regular workers with direct relation to the principal owner,” Pajel said.

Revealing action from the DOLE

 

The Duterte administration and the Labor Department may continue claiming it is taking action against contractualization. But its action reveals the opposite. For example, after the dialogue between PLDT management and its workers facilitated by the DOLE on July 2, it assured the workers the DOLE order to regularize thousands of them is final and executory.

DOLE reports that it is also intensifying its thorough inspections and assessments of various companies, especially those involved in labor disputes.

Continue reading