Statement on Pope Francis Remark Regarding Civil Unions

In a documentary film entitled FRANCESCO that premiered in Italy last week, an old interview with Pope Francis conducted in Spanish appeared where he said the following:

“Homosexuals have a right to be a part of the family. They’re children of God and have a right to a family. Nobody should be thrown out, or be made miserable because of it…What we have to create is a civil union law (emphasis added). That way they are legally covered,” the pope said. “I stood up for that.”

Many interpreted this statement on creating “ley convivencia civil” i.e., “a civil union law” as a Papal endorsement on same sex marriage.

Many countered that this is merely call for “civil co-existence” with people with same sex attraction, i.e., that there should be laws created to assure that same-sex attracted peoples and couples are not unjustly discriminated against.

We offer several points for reflection over the matter:

1. Did Pope Francis just change Church teaching on Same Sex Unions?

The answer is No.

Pope Francis has been consistent in defending natural marriage as a divinely willed institution between a man and woman, committed to live together for life, for the purpose of conception and rearing and education of children, for the good of society. Even as a Cardinal in Buenos Aires, he has spoken boldly in favor of natural marriage:

In an article that came out on L’Osservatore Romano, the then Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the Archbishop of Buenos Aires and Primate of Argentina, has said that if a proposed bill giving same-sex couples the opportunity to marry and adopt children should be approved, it will “seriously damage the family.”

He made the statement in a letter addressed to each of the four monasteries in Argentina, asking the contemplatives to pray “fervently” that legislators be strengthened to do the right thing.

He added: “In the coming weeks, the Argentine people will face a situation whose outcome can seriously harm the family…At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.”

Cardinal Bergoglio concluded: “Let us not be naive: this is not simply a political struggle, but it is an attempt to destroy God’s plan. It is not just a bill (a mere instrument) but a ‘move’ of the father of lies who seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.”

2. Does the Church care for same sex attracted persons? A big yes.

As a good pastor and leader of the Catholic Church, we see Pope Francis calling for legal protection of “civil unions” between same sex attracted persons which we cannot deny exist. While their union is in no way being endorsed as a marriage and a sacrament, the Pope is calling that rights that accrue to them as legal persons and children of God be given them and be covered by law. To make an imperfect analogy, even offenders of the law have rights and those rights have to be covered and protected by law. Such protection in is no way an endorsement of criminal activity but simply an assurance that EVERYBODY have rights before the law.

3. What is the proper forum where we can know official Church teaching?

The statement on a call for a “law on civil union” was made in a context of a casual interview. Pope Francis was not speaking in a position of teaching as the supreme teacher of the faith. A Pope’s personal views on things and formal proclamations can have differences in nuances and interpretations. Personal interviews and casual conversations do not have the power to effect changes in doctrinal and pastoral programs of the Church. Neither do they have the doctrinal, canonical and pastoral weight of a formal encyclical or apostolic exhortation.

4. What has Pope Francis officially taught about same sex unions?

If we want to know what the Pope formally teaches and endorses as the leader of the Catholic Church, we turn to official documents like Encyclicals, Apostolic Exhortations and Letters. And speaking of official Magisterial Pronouncements, this is what Pope Francis has laid down as the official position of the Magisterium of the Church:

From Amoris Laetitia n. 250:

“The Church makes her own the attitude of the Lord Jesus, who offers his boundless love to each person without exception. During the Synod, we discussed the situation of families whose members include persons who experience same-sex attraction, a situation not easy either for parents or for children. We would like before all else to reaffirm that every person, regardless of sexual orientation, ought to be respected in his or her dignity and treated with consideration, while ‘every sign of unjust discrimination’ is to be carefully avoided (emphasis added), particularly any form of aggression and violence. Such families should be given respectful pastoral guidance, so that those who manifest a homosexual orientation can receive the assistance they need to understand and fully carry out God’s will in their lives.”

Again from Amoris Laetitia n. 251 on the character of Same Sex Unions:

“In discussing the dignity and mission of the family, the Synod Fathers observed that, ‘as for proposals to place unions between homosexual persons on the same level as marriage, there are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family’” (emphasis added). It is unacceptable ‘that local Churches should be subjected to pressure in this matter and that international bodies should make financial aid to poor countries dependent on the introduction of laws to establish ‘marriage’ between persons of the same sex’”.

Let us continue to pray for the Holy Father and his solemn duty to sail the bark of Peter safely afloat amidst the confusion and challenges of the modern times.

Continue reading

Stand By Us, Dear Senators & Congressmen!

The Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas is calling on our Senators and the members of the House of Representatives to stay vigilant and to stand by us, the common Filipino, in safeguarding the country from any clear and present danger.

We are amplifying your concern and alarm over the disproportionately large number (27,000) and young age (35 years old) of these allegedly “Chinese retirees” in our country, especially during this time of pandemic and economic difficulties. These young foreigners could not only take away jobs from the Filipinos but pose a threat both to health and to our national security.

In a CNN news clip, no less than the National Security Adviser, Sec. Hermogenes Esperon said: “Influx of Chinese Nationals in PH, a security threat”.

 These young (military age) Chinese retirees could easily serve as a fifth column or a Trojan horse that could be instantly mobilized against our country.

We shout out again and again what Senator Richard Gordon said: “That’s a national interest consideration there – national security.”  ‘Damage to the country?’ Senators alarmed over 27,000 Chinese retirees in PH (Senators alarmed over 27,000 Chinese retirees in PH by: AIKA REY, RAPPLER, Oct. 19, 2020)

Let no one take our jobs, our seas, our sovereignty! Let us stand together to protect our country!

Thank you for standing with us!

For the LAIKO Board of Directors,

October 26 2020

Where The Pope Is Coming From

To our brothers and sisters in Christ, and to all people of good will:

A lot of people have sought clarification about the recent remarks Pope Francis had presumably made with regard to “civil unions”. Allow us to share some thoughts on the matter through the following reflection entitled, “Where Pope Francis is Coming From.”

The Pope speaks mainly as a shepherd who is willing to leave behind the ninety-nine (99) in search of the one lost sheep. Just because they stray doesn‟t mean they don‟t belong to the fold anymore. He is like a loving parent who just would not give up on any of his children. Just because they behave differently, or they live their lives in a manner that he does not approve of, does not mean they are not his children anymore.

This Pope has been consistent with the radicality of Jesus of Nazareth whom he calls the human face of the Merciful God. It is easier to save the good and the law-abiding; it is something else to choose to save even sinners and law-breakers with no other motive than the fact that they too are children of God and have been entrusted to his care.

In his own time, Jesus was misunderstood and judged by people because he associated with people of questionable reputation in Jewish society: the tax collectors, prostitutes, the lepers, the Roman soldiers, the rebels, the Samaritans, the people who were regarded as “sinners” in orthodox Jewish society.

What did he do? He did not avoid them. He also did not tell them that what they were doing was right. He did not openly approve of prostitution, or the use of violence to gain justice, or collaboration with the Roman government. He didn’t openly say he approved of the religion of the Samaritans or the politics of the Romans. He just treated them with the same kindness and compassion that he extended to any human being; and he was judged for it. He refused to judge the woman who had been caught in adultery without saying that what she did was right. He just did not think that condemning people or judging them was right thing to do in order to work for their conversion.

He didn’t bring them to conversion by judging them, but by loving them, caring for them, being compassionate to them. He was never of the opinion that people who did bad things were to be treated as bad people. He hated the sin but continued to love the sinner.

He also did not approve of the manner in which the guardians of morality and orthodoxy in his time conducted themselves. He did not think building the kingdom of God was a matter of teaching people proper doctrine and morals. He did it rather by emptying himself, by immersing himself fully in the human condition.

Continue reading

How to Keep the Coronavirus from Spreading in Slums?

Nais lamang po namin ibahagi sa ICSI ang isang video mula sa Deutsche Welle (DW) tungkol sa kung paano nagawa ng ibang bansa (partikular sa India) na kontrolin ang pagkalat ng COVID-19 sa mga informal settlements: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avc7jA00N18&feature=youtu.be

DW News

Bagamat hindi naman po natin nababalitaang malubha ang pagkalat ng COVID-19 sa mga siksikang pamayanan sa Pilipinas (o baka hindi lang ipinapaalam sa publiko), magandang suriin natin ang tugon ng pamahalaan sa COVID-19 at isa nga rito ang pagpapatupad ng Balik-Probinsya, Balik-Pag-asa (BP2) Program. May ilan din tayong naririnig na balita tungkol sa pag-evict ng mga pamilya sa gitna ng umiiral na community quarantine.
Speaking of Balik-Probinsya, ibinabahagi rin po namin sa inyo ang latest naming publication na Intersect Quick Facts (IQF) na naglalaman ng ilang datos na sana’y makatulong sa pag-unawa natin hindi lamang sa layunin ng BP2 kundi sa internal migration na nais tugunan (o i-reverse) ng programang ito ng administrasyon. Sana may mapulot po kayo sa mga ito.

PMPI Urban

CWS Statement on the 2021 Proposed National Budget

“It is necessary to work with greater commitment at all levels to ensure that the right to health care is rendered effective… to establish a real distributive justice which, on the basis of objective needs, guarantees adequate care to all.”

– Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, Message to participants in the 25th International Conference organized by the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers, November 15 2010

Charity is at the heart of Catholic Social Teachings. One cannot ignore the present, immediate needs of the impoverished in the hope of building a just society. Charity is intrinsically linked with justice, for to love others requires that one must first be just towards them. Consequently, the antithesis or negation of charity is injustice, social exclusion, and marginalization.

The proposed 2021 national budget does not guarantee adequate health care especially to the poorest of the poor and those severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Research group IBON expressed concern over the burgeoning budget on infrastructure amid the worst health crisis and economic decline in the country’s history. IBON noted that the proposed budget prioritizes infrastructure, debt, and militarization over health and other social services, agriculture, and industry. This is evidenced by the colossal budget for infrastructure projects (Build, build, build programs) amounting to Php 1.1 trillion (taking up 24% of the total budget) compared with Php 212.3 billion for health, Php 454.1 billion for social protection, and Php 5.1 billion support for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). The proposed budget likewise prioritizes debt-servicing and military expenditure amounting to a total of Php 740.6 billion over a minimal DOH budget of Php 131.7 billion or barely one-fifth of one percent (0.2%) of the total infrastructure spending.

IBON added that while the proposed Php 212.3-billion health budget is bigger than last year’s allocation, “allotment for facilities enhancement, epidemiological surveillance, for instance, were all reduced right when the country’s public health system sorely needs a boost.” Declines were also registered in the epidemiology and surveillance program, to P112.631 million from P115.501 million; and in the operations of national reference laboratories, down to P289.330 million from P326.330 million.

The proposed 2021 national budget is a glaring evidence that Philippine health recovery is not a priority for the Duterte administration as only a tiny fraction of the 2021 budget will be allocated for health.

A Catholic vision of health care promotes “[a] healthcare system… rooted in values that respect human dignity, protect human life, respect the principle of subsidiarity, and meet the needs of the poor and uninsured, especially the unborn children, pregnant women, immigrants, and other vulnerable populations.” (United States Conference of the Catholic Bishop, “Forming consciences for faithful citizenship”). The growing inequality in health care is due in part to the State’s abandonment of duty to protect and provide adequate health services. In a time where the county is hit by the worst health crisis and economic meltdown, the country needs to prioritize health and social assistance to the most vulnerable sectors of society. Amid economic hardships and massive unemployment, the poor needed not only charity but also justice.

Signed:

Co-Chairperson, Church People – Workers Solidarity

“Fratelli tutti”: short summary of Pope Francis’s Social Encyclical

Fraternity and social friendship are the ways the Pontiff indicates to build a better, more just and peaceful world, with the contribution of all: people and institutions. With an emphatic confirmation of a ‘no’ to war and to globalized indifference.

By Isabella Piro

What are the great ideals but also the tangible ways to advance for those who wish to build a more just and fraternal world in their ordinary relationships, in social life, politics and institutions?

This is mainly the question that Fratelli tutti is intended to answer: the Pope describes it as a “Social Encyclical” (6) which borrows the title of the “Admonitions” of Saint Francis of Assisi, who used these words to “address his brothers and sisters and proposed to them a way of life marked by the flavour of the Gospel” (Par 1). The Encyclical aims to promote a universal aspiration toward fraternity and social friendship. In the background of the Encyclical is the Covid-19 pandemic which, Francis reveals, “unexpectedly erupted” as he “was writing this letter”. But the global health emergency has helped demonstrate that “no one can face life in isolation” and that the time has truly come to “dream, then, as a single human family” in which we are “brothers and sisters all” (Par 8).

Looking at others as brothers and sisters to save ourselves and the world

Chapter One: dark clouds cover the world

In the first of eight chapters, which is entitled “Dark Clouds over a Closed World”, the document reflects on the many distortions of the contemporary era: the manipulation and deformation of concepts such as democracy, freedom, justice; the loss of the meaning of the social community and history; selfishness and indifference toward the common good; the prevalence of a market logic based on profit and the culture of waste; unemployment, racism, poverty; the disparity of rights and its aberrations such as slavery, trafficking, women subjugated and then forced to abort, organ trafficking (see Par 10-24). It deals with global problems that call for global actions, emphasizes the Pope, also sounding the alarm against a “culture of walls” that favours the proliferation of organized crime, fuelled by fear and loneliness (see Par 27-28).

Chapter Two: strangers on the road

To many shadows, however, the Encyclical responds with a luminous example, a herald of hope: the Good Samaritan. The second chapter, “A stranger on the road”, is dedicated to this figure. In it, the Pope emphasizes that, in  an unhealthy society that turns its back on suffering and that is “illiterate” in caring for the frail and vulnerable (see Par 64-65), we are all called – just like the Good Samaritan – to become neighbours to others (see Par 81), overcoming prejudices, personal interests, historic and cultural barriers. We all, in fact, are co-responsible in creating a society that is able to include, integrate and lift up those who have fallen or are suffering (see Par 77). Love builds bridges and “we were made for love” (Par 88), the Pope adds, particularly exhorting Christians to recognize Christ in the face of every excluded person (see Par 85).

Chapter Three: vision of an open world

The principle of the capacity to love according to “a universal dimension” (see Par 83) is also resumed in the third chapter, “Envisaging and engendering an open world”. In this chapter Francis exhorts us to go “‘outside’ the self” in order to find “a fuller existence in another” (Par 88), opening ourselves up to the other according to the dynamism of charity which makes us tend toward “universal fulfilment” (Par 95). In the background – the Encyclical recalls – the spiritual stature of a person’s life is measured by love, which always “takes first place” and leads us to seek better for the life of the other, far from all selfishness (Par 92-93). The sense of solidarity and of fraternity begin within the family, which are to be safeguarded and respected in their “primary and vital mission of education” (Par 114).

Continue reading