Year: 2020

To: All Laiko Members: National Lay Organizations & Arch/Diocesan Councils of the Laity
Dear Brothers and Sisters,

Two weeks ago, we prayed hard for the protection of our Lord against the devastating onslaught of Typhoon Rolly in Metro Manila and the rest of our country. We slept in peace and woke up relieved that we were spared from this Super Typhoon. But millions of our fellow Filipinos were not spared. Hardest hit were our countrymen in the Albay and Catanduanes provinces. For many, it was like a Yolanda experience.

On that same weekend, we were reminded of our membership in the great Communion of Saints, that deep bond of love and active compassion among the  Church Militant, Triumphant and those who are still suffering. In this communion, we grow as Church, one body, under Christ our head.

The Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas is calling on the generosity of our brothers and sisters to respond to our suffering brethren in Albay and Catanduanes. We are “one body under Christ” and they need our help. We are in communication with Bishop Joel Baylon, D.D. of the Diocese of Legazpi already but have no way to communicate yet with Bishop Manolo De Los Santos of the Diocese of Virac. We hope we can send them some help for the rehabilitation work needed there at this time.

Please send your donations to:

1. For the Diocese of Legazpi c/o Bishop Joel Baylon:
SOCIAL ACTION CENTER-SPM

BPI Acct# 0851-0067-37

2. For the Diocese of Virac c/o Bishop Manolo De Los Santos
BDO : RCBDVI FOR DIOCESE’S GENERAL.FUND
BDO – Virac Branch
SA# 006030001948

PNB : RCBDVI FOR DIOCESE’S GENERAL.FUND
PNB.-Virac Branch
SA# 253510025634

Thank you very much for your solidarity at this time!

For the Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas

(Sgd) Bro. Rouquel Ponte
National President

Albay, Catanduanes hardest hit by super typhoon: NDRRMC
By Priam Nepomuceno, Philippine News Agency on November 2, 2020
https://www.canadianinquirer.net/2020/11/02/albay-catanduanes-hardest-hit-by-super-typhoon-ndrrmc/

From People’s Choice Movement (PCM)

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, 

Peace!

Below is a statement of PCM’s call for unity in the 2022 election. In view of this, we would like to invite everyone (group and individuals) to join in this signature campaign while sending this at the same time to your own networks who may have our same belief.

God bless and Maraming Salamat.

On September 14, 2020, more than 60 organizations and 70 individuals signed a UNITY STATEMENT  calling for the 2022 National and Local Elections to be held as scheduled.

We now come together again, as ONE VOICE, ONE NATION, to declare: WE WANT THE ELECTIONS  OF 2022 TO BE A TRULY DEMOCRATIC EXERCISE EVERY FILIPINO CAN TRUST!

We call on COMELEC to stop using the current non-transparent automated election system, cancel and terminate any contract it may still have with its foreign provider, Smartmatic.

We demand a more accurate and transparent system that is also cost-efficient in consideration of the pandemic.

We urge Congress to now pass a law to pave the way for the COMELEC to adopt an alternative automated election system (Alternative AES) that is appropriate, more accurate, and more transparent.

We request the House of Representatives to give priority to this and work closely with the Senate on passing this bill into law and made effective for use by the COMELEC for the coming 2022 elections.

The decision to shift to an electronic voting system in 2010 which would provide a faster count and results transmission was good, but through the years, there have been many problems with the system that far outweighed the benefits and eroded the people’s trust in the automated electoral process, casting doubts on the results of each election. Here are a few examples of these problems from the 2016 & 2019 National Elections.

1. In 2016, the premature transmission of vote tallies from at least two municipalities, one day before the actual voting started. In how many more municipalities did this happen? This anomaly could not be explained.

2. Also in 2016, Smartmatic changed the transparency server script on the evening of election day, even though it was NOT given the authorization to do so by the COMELEC En Banc, as the Election Law requires.

3. In 2019, the highly controversial7-hour delay in the transmission of votes into the COMELEC transparency  server that neither COMELEC nor Smartmatic could explain. The glitch put into question the reliability of the entire election process.

In a speech made to the Filipino community in Japan, President Duterte told COMELEC “Dispose of Smartmatic, find a system free of fraud.” Many have supported this call. We the people agree and would rather have an alternative automated election system (Alternative AES) that is more transparent and FILIPINO-MADE that ensures the sovereignty of our election process.

We appeal to President Duterte, Congress, and the COMELEC, to ensure that the 2022 NATIONAL  ELECTIONS be FAIR, ACCURATE, TRANSPARENT CREDIBLE, and will  TRULY REFLECT the PEOPLE’S WILL. This will promote TRUST and UNITY between the government and its citizens, and enable us to work as one to address the challenges we face as a nation.

We also call upon all POLITICAL PARTIES and prospective CANDIDATES and their followers to get behind the move to push for an alternative automated system and to support its implementation for the 2022 national and local elections.

Finally, we call upon our FELLOW CITIZENS, especially the YOUTH, to actively PARTICIPATE in the election process, to REGISTER & VOTE, and promote the transparency and credibility of the counting process.

Signed:

Individuals:
Albert Oasan
Alberto “Bertie” Lim
Alex Ramos
Aristotle Socrates
Augusto “Gus” Lagman
Aurora Pijuan
BB Poblador
Bishop Broderick S. Pabillo
Dan
Danilo Arao
Emmanuel Sakay
Enteng Romano
Eric Alvia
Ernie del Rosario (ex Comelec ITD Head)
Hubert Guevara
Imelda “Mely” Nicolas
Joel Rocamora
Jojo Deles
Jun Cruz
Leah Navarro

November 05, 2020 Zenit Staff Vatican City

The traditional inauguration of the Nativity Scene and the lighted Christmas tree will be held, despite the COVID-19 limitations, in Saint Peter’s Square on Friday, December 11, at 4:30 pm.

According to a Vatican note, the ceremony will be presided over by Cardinal Giuseppe Bertello, President of the Governorate of Vatican City State, and Bishop Fernando Alzaga, Secretary-General of the same.

Given the circumstances the world is experiencing due to the pandemic, this year’s Christmas decoration is intended to be “a sign of hope and trust” and an expression of the “certainty that Jesus comes among His people to save them.”

The Nativity Scene, which will be set up in Saint Peter’s Square, comes from Castelli, in the Italian province of Teramo, a very important ceramics center since the 16th century. The red fir tree is 289 meters tall and 70 centimeters in diameter; it comes from the Municipality of Kocevje in South-eastern Slovenia.

The Crib

According to the press release, this Crib is characterized by being made up of ceramic statues that are larger than those of natural size.

Not only is it a cultural symbol for all the Abruzzi, but it’s also considered an object of contemporary art, which sinks its roots in the traditional work of Castelli’s ceramics. It’s a work done by the students and teachers of the F.A. Grue Art Institute, present-day State School of Art for Design.

Only a few pieces of the fragile collection of 54 statues will be displayed in Saint Peter’s Square. They will be placed along a luminous platform, of some 125 square meters, which surrounds, in a gentle slope, part of the obelisk.

Sculptures

The sculptures represent the Wise Kings. At the center, in the highest point of the platform, is the group of the Nativity Scene, with an Angel with open wings. His place above the Holy Family symbolizes his protection of the Saviour, Mary, and Joseph.

The first group of statues, made up of the Holy Family, was made together with the piper, the shepherdess with the jar, a flautist with Pan’s flute, and a girl with a doll. The inspirers of the project were Serafino Mattucci, then Director and animator of the Institute, and the teachers Gianfranco Trucchia and Roberto Bentini. The students and all the Institute’s technical staff took part with great enthusiasm.

In the Abbruzzi Crib, there are strong references to the history of ancient art, from Greek to Sumerian art, passing through Egyptian sculpture. Moreover, in the objects that enrich it and in the <pentachromia> with which the works have been decorated is found the memory of local ceramic art. The statues were made with modules of rings that, overlapping, form cylindrical busts.

Perceived in some figures, especially in the use of color, is the experimentation and renewal of the ceramic art developed in those years in the Grue Institute. The first public display of the Nativity Scene took place in Castelli, in the Mother Church in December of 1965, then Christmas of 1970 was the turn of the Trajan markets in Rome and a few years later in Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and Tel Aviv.

The Christmas Tree

The red fir comes from Kocevje, South-eastern Slovenia. This region is one of the Slovenian territories where nature is most intact, taking into account that the forests cover 90% of its territory.

The fir chosen for Saint Peter’s Square grew six kilometers in a straight line from the virgin forest of Krokar, one of the two Slovenian forest reserves. The other is Sneznik-drocle (in the Notranjska region), one of the 63 sites of ancient primordial beech trees that are on UNESCO’s world patrimony list.

Symbol of Fertility

The picea abies (red fir) spread amply in Slovenia in the second half of the 18th century. It represents over 30% of the forest resources and is the most important tree species from the economic point of view. It has been a symbol of fertility since ancient times and, in popular tradition, it is often used in ceremonies such as the May 1 celebrations or those of Christmas. In the Beka Krajina region, it was a tradition on the feast of Saint George, to carry in procession a spruce decked out with flowers and fabrics. Europe’s tallest fir, Sgermova smrek, measures 61.80 meters and is found in the Pohorje Massif in Slovenia. It’s about 300 years old, with a perimeter of three meters and 54 centimeters; its diameter is more than a meter.

The Tree and the Nativity Scene will be displayed in the Square until the end of Christmastide, which coincides with the Feast of the Baptism of the Lord, Sunday, January 10, 2021.

Laiko EMPOWERED LEADERS CONVERSATION: “DISCIPLE-MAKING ONLINE” on Saturday, November 7, 2020, 2-4 pm. Dr. Jake Yap and Bro. Abyong Calo of The Harvest Institute shared some time-tested principles and practical steps in making disciples in an online environment.

Praying for Those with COVID & Healthcare Workers, Pope Calls Being Without Public Again ‘Unfortunate’ But Responsible

November 04, 2020  Deborah Castellano Lubov General Audience

Due to the increasingly rising number of COVID19 cases every day, and increasing deaths, throughout the world and in Italy, Pope Francis returned to privately streaming his Wednesday General Audiences today November 4, 2020, while in Italy the daily number of new cases falls around 30,000, and daily deaths between 200 and 300.

This move to return without public this week was communicated in a Oct. 29 brief statement Oct. 29, issued by the Holy See Press Office to accredited journalists.

“From next Wednesday, November 4, 2020, the Holy Father’s General Audiences will again be broadcast from the Library of the Apostolic Palace,” it began, noting: “This follows the identification of a positive case of COVID-19 during the General Audience of Wednesday, October 21,” and is being done “in order to avoid any eventual future risk for the participants’ health.”

No changes have been made, for the time being, of the Pope’s Angelus in St. Peter’s Square on Sundays at noon, which are still taking place according to the necessary health protocols.

He began his remarks to those following noting that it is “unfortunate” to no longer be with the public due the resurgence of COVID, but expresses it is responsible to act in accordance with the recommendations against gatherings by the authorities.

This morning, the Pope continued his catechesis on prayer and specially Jesus as a teacher of prayer, and how his prayer life characterized all the Lord did.

“Consistent prayer,” the Pope reminded, “produces a progressive transformation, makes us strong in times of tribulation, gives us the grace to be supported by Him who loves us and always protects us.”

Toward the audience’s conclusion, the Pope also invited that in this month of November, “let us pray especially for our deceased loved ones, and for all who have died, that the Lord in his mercy will welcome them to the banquet of eternal life. Upon you and your families I invoke the joy of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Below are the Pope’s full remarks provided in English by the Vatican:

Catechesis on prayer – 13. Jesus, Teacher of prayer

Dear brothers and sisters, good morning!

Unfortunately we have had to return to holding this audience in the library, to defend ourselves against contagion by Covid. This also teaches us that we must be very attentive to the prescriptions of the authorities, both the political authorities and the health authorities, to defend ourselves against this pandemic. Let us offer to the Lord this distance between us, for the good of all, and let us think, let us think a lot about the sick, about those who are already marginalised when they enter the hospitals, let us think of the doctors, the nurses, the volunteers, the many people who work with the sick at this time: they risk their life but they do so out of love for their neighbour, as a vocation. Let us pray for them.

During His public life, Jesus constantly availed himself of the power of prayer. The Gospels show this to us when He retired to secluded places to pray. These are sober and discreet observations, that allow us only to imagine those prayerful dialogues. They clearly demonstrate, however, that even at times of greater dedication to the poor and the sick, Jesus never neglected His intimate dialogue with the Father. The more He was immersed in the needs of the people, the more He felt the need to repose in the Trinitarian Communion, to return to the Father and the Spirit.

There is, therefore, a secret in Jesus’ life, hidden from human eyes, which is the fulcrum of everything else. Jesus’ prayer is a mysterious reality, of which we have a slight intuition, but which allows us to interpret His entire mission from the right perspective. In those solitary hours – before dawn or at night – Jesus immersed Himself in intimacy with the Father, that is, in the Love that every soul thirsts for. This is what emerges from the very first days of His public ministry.

One Sabbath, for example, the town of Capernaum was transformed into a “field hospital”: after sunset they brought all the sick to Jesus, and He healed them. Before dawn, however, Jesus disappeared: He withdrew to a solitary place and prayed. Simon and the others looked for Him and when they found Him they said: “Everyone is searching for you!” How does Jesus reply? “Let us go on to the next towns, that I may preach there also; for that is why I came out” (see Mk 1:35-38). Jesus always goes a bit further, further in prayer with the Father, and beyond, to other villages, other horizons, to go and preach to other peoples.

Prayer was the rudder that guides Jesus’ course. It was not success, it was not consensus, it was not the seductive phrase “everyone is searching for you”, that dictated the stages of His mission. The path Jesus charted was the least comfortable one, but it was the one by which He obeyed the Father’s inspiration, which Jesus heard and welcomed in His solitary prayer.

The Catechism states that “When Jesus prays He is already teaching us how to pray” (no. 2607). Therefore, from Jesus’ example we can derive some characteristics of Christian prayer.

UPLB Perspective
By PB Yapjoco
November 2, 2020

Four Aetas were pressed with trumped up charges for allegedly violating the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, the Republic Act (RA) 9516 or the Illegal Possession of Explosives, and the RA 10591 o Violation Against Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition.

Among those being charged were Jay Garung, Rosalyn Urbano, Kiray Serrano and Junior Ramos, who are now experiencing detainment and separated from their families in Sitio Lumibao, Zambales.

Last August 21, over 192 families and 659 residents faced sudden eviction due to a supposed ongoing conflict with the National People’s Army (NPA), the 73rd Division Reconnaissance Company, and the 48th Infantry Battalion under the 7th Infantry Division Philippine Army (7ID PA).

The said military operation resulted into numerous bombings and attacks within the Aeta lands, disrupting the security and livelihood for hundreds of families. In an attempt to get affected Aetas to surrender in being part of the NPA, members of the 7ID PA allegedly resorted to degrading methods of torture and detainment, such as forcing victims to eat human feces and verbal abuse.

Downplaying human rights

These bombings were denied by the 7ID Public Affairs Office Chief Major Amando Gutierrez, who said that no bombing happened and that Aetans were checked by a doctor.

According to the Commision on Human Rights (CHR) spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia, “… the Commission has always reminded members of the armed forces to adhere to the principles of human rights and international humanitarian law.”

This however, is contradictory to the recent statement of Pitang Garung, the mother of Lumibao 4 victim Jay Garung, who stated that Jay had been subjected to physical and mental torture since his detainment.

“Pinaparantangan nilang NPA ang anak ko… binugbog at pinagtatadyak po nila ang anak ko, tapos pinakain pa nila ng dumi ng tao ang anak ko,” she said.

According to Sandugo-Movement of Moro and Indigenous Peoples for Self-Determination (SANDUGO) the bombardment of the Aeta community was meant to pave way for mining explorations of Dizon Copper-Silver Mines, Inc.

Some statements, contained in the documentary “Francesco” by the director Evgeny Afineevsky, elicited, in these past days, diverse reactions and interpretations. Therefore, here are some useful points in order to bring about, at his request, an adequate understanding of the words of the Holy Father.

More than a year ago, in an interview, Pope Francis responded to two distinct questions in two diverse moments that, in the aforementioned documentary, were edited and published as one answer without the proper contextualization which generated confusion.  The Holy Father has made in the first place a pastoral reference regarding the necessity of not discriminating within the family a son or a daughter because of his or her homosexual orientation. This is referred to in the following words: “Homosexuals have the right to be in a family; they are children of God who have a right to belong to a family. No one should be thrown out of a family nor someone’s life rendered difficult (or impossible) because of this (i.e. homosexual orientation)”.

The following citation in the Post-Synodal Exhortation on love in the family Amoris laetitia (2016) can clarify such expressions: “With the Synodal Fathers I have taken into consideration the situation of families who live the experience of having a member  with homosexual tendency; an experience which is not easy neither for the parents nor for the children. We would like therefore to reaffirm that every person, regardless of their sexual orientation, should be respected in his or her dignity and accepted with respect, taking care of avoiding “every trace of discrimination” and particularly every form of aggression  and violence. These families should instead be assured of a respectful guidance, so that those who manifest homosexual tendency may avail of the necessary help to understand and fully realize the will of God in their lives”. (n. 250)

A subsequent question in the interview was instead in reference to a local legislation ten years ago in Argentina on “matrimonies igualitarios (egalitarian marriages) of couples of the same sex” and the opposition of the former Archbishop of Buenos Aires on that regard. On this matter Pope Francis affirmed that “it is incongruent to speak of homosexual marriage”, stating further that, in such particular context, he spoke (instead) of the right of these persons to have legal protection: “that which we must do is a law of civil union (convivencia civil); they have the right to be legally protected. I defended this matter”.

The Holy Father articulated in an interview of 2014: “Marriage is between a man and a woman. The secular States would like to justify civil unions to regulate various situations of convivence, forced by the necessity to regulate economic matters between persons, for example to guarantee health insurance. It deals with agreements of convivence of different kinds, of which I cannot list its varied forms. It is necessary to see the various cases and evaluate them in their diversity.

It is therefore evident that Pope Francis was referring to particular State provisions, not definitely in reference to the doctrine of the Church, reaffirmed numerous times over the years.