English “Hindi na Sapat ang Mangarap; Kailangan Nang Magtaya”

Statement of the Department of Theology, Ateneo de Manila University
about the May 2022 Election

The upcoming May election is a critical moment in our history. Our precarious future will be determined by our choices for new leaders. In the meantime, social media is being bombarded by discordant voices vying for our support – from flowery promises of a more prosperous future to voices of steely confidence of discipline and integrity to the voices of those with no real platform or thought offered beyond superficial slogans for the good of the country. In our online classrooms and social media spaces, we hear the voices of the youth, awakened to the plight of various sectors of society, speaking up, clamoring, and working with hope for change.

Many are promising change, but what direction should we pursue and whose platforms should we support? While we uphold that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to their conscience, we must seek the truth and make judgments according to it for “without trust and love for what is true, there is no social conscience and responsibility.” Conscience’s dignity is compromised when it shows little concern to seek what is true and good. To follow our conscience equally requires the obligation to form it, anchored in God’s vision of justice and inclusive love revealed in the Gospel.

Hence, we are called to reflect on the future we want for our generation, one that is a “strongly rooted, comfortable, and secure life….secure in the knowledge that we have enough for our daily needs and unexpected expenses, that we can plan and prepare for our and our children’s future” as described by NEDA. How committed are we to realize that dream? For the past six years, we have endured a government associated with rampant impunity and corruption, incompetent leadership, and the failure to deliver real change. It is now time to face the future with courage.

Hindi na sapat ang mangarap, kailangan nang magtaya.

Over and against power that forces us to forget, we have to remember the dangerous memories of the atrocities of Martial Law, and make hard choices, even at the risk of being misunderstood or judged. We have to act now even if others think our efforts may prove to be futile. Despite the price we have to pay, we continue to hope not only for ourselves but for everyone who believes that “another world is not only possible, she is on her way” (Arundhati Roy).

“What kind of world do we want to leave to those who come after us, to children who are now growing up?” For them, we envision a world where there is justice and social participation for all, commitment to the common good, and special care for the vulnerable and marginalized. Integral human development includes not only care for the human person but also for the Earth, our common home. We hope for leaders who will hear both the cry of the earth and the cry of the poor. We continue to hope in the promise already accomplished by Christ’s Resurrection that “God will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away” (Revelation 21:4).

The world we envision stands in contrast to the Philippines today. Many poor Filipinos have fallen victim to the war on drugs. The pandemic exposed the limits of populist campaign promises. Institutional gaps in our economic, social, and health care systems worsened an already dehumanizing poverty. Countless more have lost their security, their livelihood and their lives. Courageous voices of dissent are red-tagged. Women are ridiculed in public speeches. Our economic and political elites continue to prosper at the expense of our natural resources, our indigenous peoples, and our farmers and fisherfolk. We have seemed to have forgotten our vow to never again tolerate impunity and oppression.

The signs of the times call all of us to prophetically defend the truth, even at the risk of being labelled “divisive.” The call for “Unity” is empty at the expense of Gospel values. Authentic unity is grounded in truth, inclusive justice, and good governance. While there may be a myriad of voices calling out for change and more than one candidate and their platforms espouse the principles and vision of hope, we strongly endorse the candidacies of Leni Robredo and Kiko Pangilinan, which embody the ideals of exemplary leadership untainted by corruption and the needed competence to address society’s many social ills. A vote for the Robredo-Pangilinan tandem is not just a vote for viable candidates, but it is also a vote for the ultimate good of our nation. One such vote is a vote for candidates who espouse the Gospel and Filipino values. It is a vote against the return of the Marcos and Duterte Dynasties in power which destroyed much of the nation’s social fabric. It is a vote against those candidates who destroy the integrity of creation and the dignity and rights of peoples, distort the truth, and perpetuate unjust systems and structures that continue to beget the kinds of evil that continue to oppress the Filipino.

Kay Leni at Kiko tayo magtaya. Mangarap… magtaya para sa Pilipinas.

As mission continues, CBCP head calls to include ‘those on fringes’

Photos By Sammy Navaja
By CBCP News
April 25, 2022
Manila, Philippines

The Philippine Catholic Church on Sunday officially ended its celebration of the quincentenary of Christianity in the Philippines by emphasizing the need for the Church to turn towards the fringes of society.

Echoing Pope Francis, the episcopal conference’s president, Bishop Pablo Virgilio David, said that the church does not even have to go distant places to engage in mission.

“The ones we are sent to might not even be very far from us— they are around us, in the peripheries,” David said in his homily during the closing Mass at the Cebu Metropolitan Cathedral.

“We are never to allow it to happen that those kept at the fringes of society are also kept at the fringes of the Church,” he said.

Citing the Catholic social teachings, he said the only “civilization” that Christians should aim to build is something that “aims to raise our level of humanity” by caring for the poor and the vulnerable.

There is nothing Christian, according to him, in works that exclude the majority and treat the poor like “disposable trash”.

“In a truly humane society we are mindful of the common good; we protect and empower the weakest. Everyone matters. It is what being in mission means,” David said.

The last week of the year-long celebration was capped with the virtual 2nd National Mission Congress in two parts: the International Missiology Symposium and the National Mission Forum.

Among those who graced the Mass were 12 bishops, including Archbishop Charles Brown, the Apostolic Nuncio to the Philippines, and Bishop Socrates Mesiona, head of the CBCP Episcopal Commission on Mission.

The Vatican envoy encouraged the faithful “to keep our faith strong” and share it to other places in the world.

He also paid tribute to the parents “who give the light and life of the Catholic faith to their children”.

“There are no more important missionaries than fathers and mothers,” Brown said. “So, parents, grandparents, remember that you are missionaries in the most profound sense of the world.”

The gathering was also highlighted with the mission-send off rites for 5 priests, 5 religious women and several members of lay group Couples for Christ who are off to various missions in the Philippines and overseas.

The missionaries were also conferred with a “mission cross” by the papal nuncio.

Priests, religious urged to take ‘active role’ in Philippine elections

Priests and religious have reportedly “forgotten to be prophets” and have not helped people to work for “principled political participation”

Marielle Lucenio
April 22, 2022

Members of the clergy in the province of Bataan have openly endorsed the candidacy of Vice President Leni Robredo during a political rally on April 19, 2022. (Photo by Jire Carreon)

Members of the clergy and the religious should take an “active role” in politics, especially during the national elections on May 9.

The call was made by Vincentian priest and theologian Daniel Franklin Pilario during an online forum hosted by the Conference of Major Superiors in the Philippines on April 22.

Without naming names, Father Pilario said priests and religious should “promote efforts against some candidates” and “endorse others who can protect us” from atrocities like what happened during the years of martial law in the Seventies and the Eighties.

He said Church people should take a stand against “atrocious crimes,” such as human rights violations committed during martial law and in the recent “war on drugs” of the government.

The priest noted that many among members of the clergy and the religious have “forgotten to be prophets” and have not helped the lay people to work for “principled political participation.”

“If we are followers of Christ, why were we silent in times of killings?” said Father Pilario in Filipino.

Statements made by several Church leaders, who endorsed candidates for the coming elections, have become the subject of discussions within and outside the Church in recent weeks.

“We should have moved and taught people how to engage in partisan politics,” said the Vincentian theologian.

“We have to remember that peace and harmony should be based on justice, and if there is no justice and if [people] are killed, then you have [not achieved peace],” he said.

He then reminded priests and religious that “not working for the Gospel is not preaching it,” adding that “If you want to preach Jesus, be political.”

In a pastoral letter released in March, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines called on voters to elect candidates who will improve people’s lives, especially the poor and the vulnerable.

“We need competent leaders and lawmakers with sincere intentions to serve the welfare of our communities,” read the bishops’ statement.

Continue reading

FFF Condemns Assault on Leody De Guzman and Unarmed Lumads in Bukidnon

Urges President Duterte, Zubiris to Enforce IP Rights in Ancestral Lands

(April 20, 2022)

          The Federation of Free Farmers (FFF) condemned the assault on presidential candidate Leody de Guzman and unarmed lumads (indigenous peoples)  – including women and children – in barangay San Jose, Quezon, Bukidnon last April 19 by security guards of an agribusiness corporation allegedly owned and controlled by Mayor Pablo Lorenzo III of Quezon municipality.        

          At the same time, FFF Board Chairman and former Agriculture Secretary Leonardo Q. Montemayor urged President Duterte, Bukidnon Governor Jose Zubiri, Jr. and his son – incumbent Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri – to act decisively to prevent further violence and to enforce the ancestral land rights of lumads.

          Five (5) persons were reportedly wounded by the security personnel of the Kiantig Development Corporation (KDC), using shotguns, M16 and M14 high powered weapons.  De Guzman was unhurt in the incident.  Police and military personnel, who were in the vicinity during the shootings, reportedly did not intervene.

         Earlier on April 18, Supreme Datu Rolando Anglao of the Manobo-Pulangiyon tribe met with Mayor Lorenzo, Chairman Allen Capuyan of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) and other government representatives.  He informed them that the lumads  would be reclaiming the 1,111-hectare area in barangays Butong and San Jose that was officially recognized last October 6, 2021 by the NCIP as the ancestral domain of the tribe – being the “rightful owner and possessor” thereof.

         Since 2017, about a thousand lumad families have encamped in tents and makeshift shelters along the national highway in Quezon just outside their ancestral land, which have been fenced off by the KDC and planted to pineapple previously for Del Monte Philippines and lately to Lapanday Corporation.

          According to FFF Board Chairman Leonardo Q. Montemayor, the disputed area in sitio Kiantig had been originally leased to the Montalvan Ranch in the 1960s.  Somehow, the KDC under Lorenzo managed to secure leasehold rights over the property.   In 2018, the 25-year lease period ended, and the area was reclassified as forest land under the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.  During the Ramos presidency, top DENR officials declared that the area was part of the ancestral domain of the Manobo-Pulangiyon, pursuant to the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997 (Republic Act No. 8371).

          Montemayor called on Governor Zubiri to live up to his title, “Datu Intunda” (Chief Guardian Angel), which was conferred on him by the Seven Tribes of Bukidnon in the 1970s.

PMPI Statement On Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Remarks On Recognizing That Nature Has Its Own Rights

The recent statement by presidential aspirant Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. vowing to prioritize the protection of the environment [1] and recognizing Nature’s Rights saying “it has its own rights and should be allowed to flourish, reproduce and attain its abundance side by side with human civilization in perfect balance and harmony with our growing communities” seems to be a positive statement for us,  Rights of Nature [2] advocates in the country.

We were surprised and cannot help but be very worried though by this statement from Mr. Marcos Jr. because our assessment of his stance on environmental protection and mining garnered him a low rating in our profiling research called the Power of Purple 2022 [3]. Of the seven (7) presidential candidates, he got an ambivalent rating for his position on environmental protection as we could only find general statements admonishing environmental protection without details of why’s and the how’s of such position. Although he got positive points for pushing for bills on green building and PAG-ASA modernization, he got a negative rating on mining because he supports it and believes that it is a key source of revenue and employment to prop up our economy. On a similar note, he is likewise supportive of the operation of the Bataan nuclear power plant which might have a devastating impact on the people and the environment.

An extractive-oriented economy is an anti-thesis of the rights of nature perspective. Massive extraction or large-scale mining carries an ideology that sees nature as objects that is infinite and are there to be used, processed, and sold for the sake of profit and human development. Mr. Marcos needs to realize that taking on the rights of nature paradigm demands a whole paradigm shift in the way economics, legal and socio-political systems should function in relation to the environment.

Currently, Rights of Nature bills have been filed in Congress by Senator Risa Hontiveros and Cong. Kit Belmonte with six (6) other co-authors. They were referred to several committees and only the bill in the lower house had been on the agenda of one committee, and only once, we reckon, owing to the lack of understanding of the urgency to protect the environment and address the current climate crisis and emergency.

We lament the low level of attention given by many of the 2022 election candidates on the importance of addressing environmental issues in their platforms and discourses. The intersectional relationship of the environment with all other issues have not been recognized and highlighted — its connection to strong typhoons, disasters, the sorry state of agriculture and fisheries, our health, and even the armed conflicts whose roots are driven by lack of access to resources. To add, despite the warning of our climate scientists in their UN report [4] that humanity only has three more years to curb greenhouse gas emissions to avoid more severe climate disasters, or face irreversible and fatal consequences, many still regard climate emergency issues as just among the many other problems

Continue reading

Halalan Bingo at the Diocese of Parañaque

April 4, 2022

Dear Laiko Brothers and Sisters,

May we forward to you a Halalan Bingo material developed by our Paranaque Diocesan Council of the Laity as their contribution to the “Voter Empowerment” effort we are all being called to do.

In the latest pastoral letter issued by the CBCP, our bishops said:

“the family, community, and encourage participation; defend rights and fulfill responsibilities; demonstrate preferential option for the poor and vulnerable; uphold the dignity of work and the rights of workers; work for solidarity; and care for God’s creation.”

Furthermore they said: “Let us identify the candidates who put the welfare of the nation above their personal interests. We can employ the ‘LASER test’ on the candidates. LASER stands for Lifestyle, Action, Supporters, Election conduct and Reputation of a candidate.”

The DCL of Paranaque is willing to assist you in rolling this out in your respective parishes. Pls see their email below.

Thanks

Sincerely yours,


DOP CIRCULAR NO. 2022 – 032

23 March 2022

ATTENTION: ALL PARISH PRIESTS, PAROCHIAL VICARS, RECTORS OF SHRINES, PARISH PASTORAL COUNCIL HEADS IN THE DIOCESE OF PARAÑAQUE

SUBJECT: VOTER’S EDUCATION GUIDELINES – HALALAN BINGO 2022

Your Reverence, brothers and sisters:

Peace!

In view of the upcoming election on May 9, 2022, the Diocesan Council of the Laity created a Voter’s Education model called “Halalan Bingo 2022”. It is a simplified discernment process on how to choose the best presidential candidate for our country in the spirit of synodality, listening to one another.

It aims to provide sound criteria and relevant information out of a fruitful discussion or “talakayan” to guide participants in coming up with a well informed decision. As lay servants of the Lord, we have a responsibility to help one another in this crucial time of choosing our next leader. Our ultimate goal is to reach our poor communities who are most vulnerable to massive disinformation and proliferation of lies.

We call on all Parish Pastoral Council Heads with the support of their respective Vicariate Coordinators to be the overall coordinator of this program in each parish. Expectations are as follows:

1. Ensure that this program is cascaded to all lay servants, their families, parishioners, renewal movements and poor communities within the boundaries of your parish before the May 9 election.

2. Identify potential facilitators who will conduct the sessions. Training will be provided.

3. Provide facilitators with the relevant materials.

4. Ensure sessions are conducted to all developing communities of your parish with COSHP’s assistance.

5. Report to the Vicariate coordinator the progress of this program e.g., no. of sessions conducted, no. of participants attended, succeeding schedules, etc.)

Virtual training sessions via Zoom for facilitators of the Halalan Bingo 2022 are scheduled on:

March 25, April 4, 6 & 8 from 8:00 to 9:00 PM. Participants need only to attend one. Each training session will be limited to the first 300 registrants. Those who have attended a virtual training session can train other facilitators in their parish.

Continue reading

Ten Questions Concerning the Political Participation of the Clergy and Religious

By Daniel Franklin E. Pilario, CM

1. Should the Church get involved in politics?

We have heard this for the longest time: the Church should never get involved in politics because it is a violation of the “separation of the Church and State”. We need to settle this once and for all. There is no such prohibition in the Church. Such prohibition is a Constitutional injunction for the State, not for the Church. First, it states that the State shall not pass laws establishing any religion (Art. III, Sec. 5). Second, the State shall not pass laws prohibiting the free exercise of any religion (Art III, Sec. 5). These are called the “non-establishment clause” and the “free exercise” clause. In short, only the State can violate it, not the Church or any church personnel. When Duterte and his government criticize the Church for violating the separation of Church and State, they are “barking at the wrong tree”.

On the contrary, it is the role of all citizens—Churches and their members included—to call out the State authorities when they favor one religious group over another or prohibit some religions the free exercise of their beliefs.

In Fratelli Tutti, Pope Francis writes: Politics is “one of the highest forms of charity, inasmuch as it seeks the common good” (FT 180). “A good Catholic meddles in politics so that those who govern can govern well.” This is not new; he was just quoting Pope Paul VI in Evangelii Nuntiandi (1106) and earlier popes on the notion of political charity.

But because of the strong influence of the dualistic view of Christian spirituality with regard politics, I observe several kinds of Christians in our times: (a) apolitical Christians — those who think that their home is in “heaven” and what happens in this “world” is of little or no value at all; (b) neutral Christians — those who follow the minimum requirements of political duties like the elections but consider it a “private affair”; when it is a question of injustice, they are neutral; (c) non-neutral but non-partisan — those who call out society on human rights violations as against Christian principles but refuse to name names or promote partisan candidates; (d) non-neutral and partisan — those who engage in social and political issues and get involved in partisan politics.

Based on the majority of church documents, the third type (non-neutral but non-partisan) is the place for the religious and clergy. The fourth type (non-neutral and partisan) should be the responsibility of the laity.

2. Does the proper “religious mission” of the Church prohibit the clergy from engaging in politics?

Vatican II documents and Canon Law are used by many writers to prove that the clergy cannot engage in politics because the Church’s proper mission is “religious”.  Based on these quotations (and their parallels in other church documents), the conclusion is that bishops and priests cannot engage in partisan politics. Doing otherwise would be “crossing the line”, as one author suggests.

“Christ, to be sure, gave his Church no proper mission in the political, economic, or social order. The purpose which He set before her is a religious one.” (GS, 42)

Continue reading

Disturbing Moral Issues on the Candidacy of FM Jr.

Archbishop-Emeritus Antonio Ledesma, SJ

 “Non-partisan, but not neutral…” has been the stance of many church leaders during this electoral period.  Non-partisan because bishops and priests, as institutional leaders of the church, are pastors of a community that is open to all, sinners and saints, and should not be divided by political affiliations.  On the other hand, religious leaders cannot be neutral when the issues involve a moral dimension. 

During this election campaign period, many voices have been heard over social media and in political rallies.  Candidates focus on their strong points, promises are made, while questions about the moral conduct of past and present activities are glossed over.  It is in this light that the prophetic role of church leaders must be heard.  The candidacy of Ferdinand Marcos Jr. for President, in particular, has raised a number of moral issues.  The reports and comments of several knowledgeable observers articulate these concerns.

I  PLUNDER AND CORRUPTION CHARGES

1)  “$683 Million (or ₱34 billion) worth of Marcos assets in various Swiss banks were declared as ill-gotten wealth, based on a July 2003 Supreme Court decision.”(newsinfo.inquirer.net)

2)  “Marcos Jr. is aware of major judicial rulings in three countries (the Philippines, the United States and Switzerland) over the years that prove the existence of ill-gotten wealth. But he has decided to look the other way.” (Prof. Ed Garcia, ConCon delegate, 1987)

3)  “In 1991, the BIR assessed the amount of ₱23.3 billion in estate taxes on the estate left by the dictator Marcos.  Bongbong is the administrator of the estate of his father.  Bongbong ignored the collection notices since then.  The total now due of the estate taxes and the interest and surcharges thereon is ₱203.8 billion….Bongbong was implicated in the Janet Napoles pork barrel scam.  He placed several million pesos in 2011 and 2012 in nine short projects in four Napoles bogus NGOs.” (Ret. Chief Justice Hilario Davide, Jr.)

4)  “The World Bank and UN Office on Drugs and Crimes said Marcos, having the longest reign as a dictator, stole between $5 billion and $10 billion from the country’s coffers. The corruption was so outrageous that it earned the distinction of being “The Greatest Robbery of a Government” from the Guinness Book of World Records.” (Kurt dela Peña, in World Mission)

II  TAX EVASION AND MORAL TURPITUDE

5)  “I find that the Respondent’s repeated and persistent non-filing of income tax returns in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985, which resulted in his conviction, constitutes an offense involving moral turpitude;… the fact that these omissions were repeated, persistent and consistent is reflective already of a conscious design and intent to avoid a positive duty under the law and intent to evade the taxes due…. Significantly, at the time when Respondent chose not to comply with the duty to society, not only was he a high-ranking government official, he was also the son of the President of the Philippines.” (Comelec Commissioner Rowena Guanzon)

6)  “He has been found guilty by a Regional Trial Court and the Court of Appeals of tax evasion for the billions of pesos in unpaid taxes racked up by the Marcos estate.” (Prof. E. Garcia)

Continue reading