To: All LAIKO Members: Arch/Diocesan Councils of the Laity & National Lay Organizations
Dear Brother and Sisters:
The peace and love of the merciful Lord!
As we continue with our thrust to conduct series of follow-thru conversations to highlight the areas of concerns in the Resolutions of the LAIKO National Convention, we are pleased to invite you once again to an Online Conversation on “Political Love” on Saturday, February 12, 2022, 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
We have invited the LAIKKO Pampanga to share their Circle of Discernment Model- “Mapagkakatiwalaang Katiwala”, to give us the opportunity to learn how they prepared and implemented it.
Kindly invite the members of your organizations, family members & friends to join us too. To register & be acknowledged, please email: laiko_phils@yahoo.com.ph. For those who cannot join the Zoom room, you may watch it live at the Facebook pages of Sangguniang Laiko ng Pilipinas & CBCP News.
Thank you very much. We are looking forward seeing you all once again.
Philippine Church leaders reaffirm their commitment “to lead by example” in promoting the use of renewable energy
January 30, 2022
Then God spoke to Noah, saying, “Go out of the ark, you and your wife and your sons and your sons’ wives with you. Bring out with you every living thing of all flesh that is with you, birds and animals and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, that they may breed abundantly on the earth, and be fruitful and multiply on the earth. – Genesis 8:15-17
Today, COVID-19 has taken more than 5.62 million1 lives globally and plunged nations into economic devastation. As we strive to recover from this crisis, the pause imposed by the pandemic on industrial and economic activity encourages us to reflect on the decades of polluting practices our Common Home has had to suffer at the hands of humanity – practices which nations around the world are now, sadly, swiftly returning to.
This is concerning as, while suffering from the impact of the pandemic, climate-vulnerable nations have also experienced intensifying calamities due to the instability of our biosphere. The Philippines, for example, was battered by multiple tropical storms including some declared to be the deadliest in the world from 2013 to 2021.
This has happened even after almost two years of the issuance of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) Pastoral Letter on Ecology entitled “An Urgent Call for Ecological Conversion, Hope in the Face of Climate Emergency”.
The Pastoral Letter is a testimony of the Church’s long-standing regard for the care of God’s creation. It is guided by the wisdom of our Holy Father Pope Francis’s encyclical, Laudato Si’ On Care for Our Common Home, which calls “for a new dialogue about how we are shaping the future of our planet” (LS, 14).
Time and again, we consider and listen to the findings of competent ecological scientists as they “are in a good position to tell us” about the “magnitude of the destruction taking place in our time”.
Even with the pastoral letter and the Pope’s encyclical, we continue to suffer an increasingly warming world and ailing biosphere triggered by exploitative practices that benefit the wealthy few but cause poverty and hunger to many.
At the same time, we are saddened that many of our faithful and partners taking peaceful actions toward ecological conversion are also experiencing increasing harassment and violence.
The proposed measures and policies for addressing the impacts of this crisis should always place social and ecological justice at the forefront. As one of the most vulnerable nations in this era of global emergency, the Philippines has the moral imperative of pursuing the most sustainable development pathway possible for the sake of current and future generations, ensuring that the voices of everyone are accounted for. The task of ensuring this becomes all the more apparent in the context of an upcoming national election that will shape governance in our country during this critical decade for climate and ecological action.
We are committed to advance the teachings of the Laudato Si’ and be bearers of hope in the face of an ecological crisis, following our Lord Jesus, our redeemer. As such, we commit to “integrate the care of creation as our common home in our teaching and practice of Christian discipleship” through concrete ecological actions in caring for our Common Home. In 2019, the CBCP Pastoral Letter on Ecology detailed 13 such action points; in 2020, the celebration of the special anniversary year of Pope Francis’s encyclical led to the creation of Laudato Si’ Goals (LSGs) to guide our work towards integral ecology.
Today, we strongly enjoin all our brothers and sisters in dioceses across the country to be further guided by the following reflections:
1. Ecological Conversion through Stewardship of our Resources
Laudato Si’ Goals: Response to Cry of the Earth and Ecological Economics
We believe that the full alignment of all nations to the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement is necessary to truly respect our planet’s ecological limits. In the 2021 United Nations climate conference (COP 26), countries around the world agreed that there is an “urgency of enhancing ambition and action in relation to [climate] mitigation, adaptation, and finance”, including phasing down coal and deeply cutting both carbon and non-carbon emissions by 2030. As a climate vulnerable country that must lead in demanding the fruition of this goal, the Philippines must ensure that its greenhouse gas emissions, especially those from fossil fuels, peak much earlier than the year 2030.
The peak in our country’s use of coal, the dirtiest of all fossil fuels, should pave the way for a complete phase-out of all other polluting energy. This will happen only if financial resources are re-channeled so as to disable the coal industry. Financing for fossil gas, which is expanding greatly in the Philippines today and threatening vital life systems, must also be done away with.
Hence, re-echoing the statement of the civil society on the submission of the country’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), the climate commitment should “include clear decarbonization pathways, indicative of a just transition in the energy sector, with a higher share of unconditional commitments, established timeline for reducing the reliance on fossil fuels, a rejection of nuclear power, and ambitious targets for renewable energy development and efficiency by 2050”.
In our recent Pastoral Letter on Ecology, we wrote that we must “not allow the financial resources of our Catholic institutions to be invested in favor of coal-fired power plants, mining companies and other destructive extractive projects.” This was strengthened by the Holy See’s Laudato Si’ manual for Church leaders and workers which includes calls for pollution reduction, decarbonization of energy and economic sectors, and investing in clean and renewable energy which is accessible to all.
Through efforts by many members of the Church and civil society, we are now all the more aware that many of the financial institutions in whom we place our trust have been instrumental in the rise of fossil fuels, as well as other destructive and exploitative industries like mining and logging.
It is unacceptable that finances so graciously provided to us are used for such industries. Financial resources must be used solely for the Common Good, Integrity of Creation, and the Glory of our Creator. Thus, we affirm our commitment to divest from coal and other destructive industries, and urge the whole Body of the Church to:
● Examine all banks and institutions in whom we have entrusted financial resources, and assess the social and environmental implications of their financing activities;
● Use our position as shareholders, clients, or stakeholders of financial institutions in and beyond the Philippines, but especially towards domestic banks, to demand for policies and plans to phase out their exposure to coal, fossil gas, and destructive energy in line with the 1.5°C ambition. The CBCP National Laudato Si Program, together with partners and experts, is asked to strategically engage with Catholic institutions, such as but not limited to archdioceses, dioceses, and religious congregations and communities, to act on ecological financial stewardship, and provide technical support and capacity building;
● Without clear commitments and policies from these banks to divest from fossil fuels, we commit to withdraw all our resources that are with them not later than 2025, and hold them accountable to their fiduciary duties and moral obligations as climate actors;
● Steer resources of the Church to genuinely sustainable ventures by actively urging financial entities to adopt sustainable finance policies and invest in renewable energy and ecological restoration and protection efforts;
● Lead by example by promoting the use of renewable energy and other sustainable systems in our own facilities and communities;
● Urge all institutions holding the Church’s financial resources to move away from extractive industries, including logging and mining, with haste. We will not support any activity that leads to promoting destructive mining, recognizing the suffering it has and continues to bring upon the environment and affected communities;
● Assert a CBCP-initiated non-acceptance policy of donations of whatever kind, from owners or operators and any representative of extractive industries especially coal, fossil gas, mining, quarrying, logging, etc. (regardless of scale of operation); and
● Build the knowledge and capacity of our congregations, schools, communities, and organizations to meaningfully contribute to the call for divestment through education campaigns and programs.
2. Laudato Si’ Formation and the National Laudato Si’ Program
Laudato Si’ Goals: Ecological Education, Ecological Spirituality, and Community Resilience and Empowerment
The Pastoral Letter of 2019 and the steadfast commitment of our brothers and sisters in Christ have birthed a National Laudato Si’ Program that will guide ecclesial communities to live the teachings of Laudato Si’.
We have sowed beginnings of what could be a thriving network of workers for our Common Home across all dioceses, including the establishment of 15 Ecology Desks across the Philippines. Let us build on these through the following:
● Continue the creation of an Ecology Desk in every diocese, a mandate first initiated by our predecessors during the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines in 1991 and later affirmed with urgency by the Pastoral Letter of 2019, and strengthen the capacities of existing Ecology Desks. This would require our respective bishops and religious superiors to prioritize the allocation of budget and financial support for the desk and its activities aligning with the 13 ecological actions of the 2019 Pastoral Letter on Ecology in which the National Laudato Si’ Program is also instructed to conduct a stocktaking of such actions;
● Institutionalize the celebration of the Season of Creation and Laudato Si’ Week to nourish our spirituality and awaken our identity as members of a single, sacred Earth-community called to care for our Common Home and all life in it; and
● Strengthen and participate in the National Laudato Si’ Program, where representatives of dioceses, members of communities of faith, and civil society can work together in national and sub-regional levels. This ecological convergence is expected to support and promote the Church’s Laudato Si’ Action Platform (LSAP).
● Through the National Laudato Si’ Program, mandate pursuit of and participation in education campaigns, such as the Deep Journey to Laudato Si’, which will deepen our collective understanding of the challenges faced by our Common Home and strengthen our unity to take action.
● Intensify existing efforts to establish Laudato Si’ schools framework or guidance where civil society, faith-based organizations and the academe led by the Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines (CEAP) work together in synergy; and popularize the Holy Father’s suggested “little daily actions” highlighted in Laudato Si’ passage 211 in campuses and community partners.
3. Advancement of the Rights of Nature and the Defense of Life
Laudato Si’ Goals: Response to the Cry of the Poor and Adoption of Sustainable Lifestyles
We renew our commitment to advance the Rights of Nature campaign. This is our contribution to the preservation of the delicate interdependence among all forms of life, recognizing that all elements of nature have the common right to exist and flourish.
We believe that the proposed piece of legislation for the recognition of the rights of nature that is now awaiting decision in both houses of Congress can push forward a Philippine society where mining, fossil fuels, development aggression, and other forms of ecological destruction are cast away.
It would serve as a barrier to detrimental projects that would only benefit the few while exacerbating the climate vulnerability of many.
Moreover, we affirm the vigilance of many indigenous groups, local and faith communities, members of civil society, and others who are risking their lives so that projects that mar nature may be derailed.
However, we are alarmed by the persisting culture of impunity that threatens environmental defenders. As such, we call on the whole body of the Church to:
● Support the Rights of Nature Bill in Congress and Senate, and push for environmental local ordinances that promote the same;
● Implement education and information campaigns on the Rights of Nature and Integral Ecology;
● Establish coordination and dialogue platforms with local government units for eco-governance initiatives and programs;
● Call on the national government and its line agencies to respect and support the environmental code of local government units, especially those that ban destructive extractive and polluting projects;
● Demand transparency and genuine stakeholder involvement from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) in all decisions made relative to ecologically and socially hazardous endeavors including mining, logging, construction or operation of infrastructure and energy or other industrial facilities, and others;
by Bp. Pablo Virgilio S. David, D.D Bishop of Kalookan President, CBCP January 27, 2022
Your Eminences, your Excellencies, especially our Apostolic Nuncio to the Philippines, dear brother archbishops, bishops and diocesan administrators of the Philippines, magandang umaga po sa inyong lahat.
We enter into this 123rd CBCP Plenary Assembly in the spirit of synodality to listen to one another, and to foster communion, participation and mission, especially as we face these challenging times of the third year of the Covid pandemic, and as we prepare for the May 2022 elections.
Many of our brothers and sisters in the Visayas and Mindanao are still struggling to stand on their feet again after that devastating typhoon Odette that left thousands homeless and caused unspeakable damages on properties and lives.
We think in particular of the faithful of Surigao under the spiritual leadership of Bishop Yiet, those of Tagbilaran under Bishop Abet, Talibon under Bishop Danny, Maasin under Bishop Precious, Tandag under Bishop Raul, San Carlos under Bishop Gerry, Cebu under Archbishop Joe, Dumaguete under Bishop Julito, Puerto Princesa under Bishop Soc, Taytay Under Bishop Broderick, and Kabankalan under Bishop Louie.
Excellency, our dear Papal Nuncio, please convey our heartfelt thanks to the Holy Father for remembering the Philippines in his prayers, especially the survivors of typhoon Odette.
We remember with sadness our brother Archbishop Romulo De la Cruz of Zamboanga who passed on last December 10, 2021. And we pray for Archbishop Ramon Arguelles, emeritus of Lipa, who, according to Archbishop Gilbert, is critically ill, and has opted to stay home and prepare for the inevitable instead of submitting himself to any further medical intervention. We also pray for Bishop Joe Bantolo of Masbate who underwent a colon surgery last Tuesday.
We thank the Lord that Bishop Val Dimoc, who is currently still in the hospital for a severe case of Covid, is on his way to recovery. He is virtually present, by the way, following our plenary from his hospital bed. We note with relief that the rest of those who also got infected by the virus and have already fully recovered.
Of course we rejoiced with Malaybalay for their new bishop who was ordained last September 14, 2021. Sorry, Bishop Noel Pedregosa, we were prevented by Covid from attending your ordination. Although you have already been with us as diocesan administrator we welcome you again, nevertheless, to the CBCP.
Allow me now to share some thoughts related to the challenges that we are currently facing as a conference of bishops.
From the year 1997 to 2000, in preparation for the coming of the Third Millennium, the CBCP started issuing one Pastoral Exhortation per year: on Economy in 1997, on Politics in 1998, on Culture in 1999, and on Spirituality in 2000. I remember how the late Dr. Tony Ledesma approached me one day, asking for a favor on behalf of the late Archbishop Legaspi. Back then he and his wife were running an NGO known as “CENDHRRA”.
Doc Tony, as I fondly called him, told me in confidence that he used to do a lot of drafting of pastoral statements for the CBCP before, but that he was no longer as adept as he used to be. Apparently, Archbishop Legaspi had asked to find someone to draft the pastoral on spirituality. He said with a tone of sadness that he would actually have done it himself if he had not been diagnosed of Parkinson’s disease. And so his request was, would I kindly do it for him?
I remember how I spoke very frankly to him. I said, “With all due, respect, Doc Tony, do you really think those CBCP pastorals are read and taken seriously by our people? In the first place, they are all written in English, never in a language that the majority would understand. Whom are they really addressing in their letters? (I did not imagine back then that I would be asking the same question again, but this time already as part of the Church’s leadership body that I used to criticize.)
Back then, I also said to Doc Tony, “I would understand the need for an English version if it is a translation from an original text in a Filipino language—no matter if that language might be Tagalog, Cebuano, or Ilocano. Other non-English speaking conferences of bishops sometimes also see the need to have English versions of some of their messages. But you can always be sure that the original texts are always in their own native languages.”
I find it sad that up until now we still communicate to one another mainly in a language that is foreign to all of us. In today’s stratification of the Philippine society, the English language allows us to communicate mainly to those in the upper strata of Philippine society, the more educated class. In a very recent survey that classified Filipino voters by their socio-economic status, we are told that only 3.7M voters actually belong to the ABC educated classes on top of the pyramid, while 48.2 M voters come from the class D and 9.9 M from the Class E.
We must admit with regret that language and our manner of communicating ourselves has been one of the reasons why many of those in the D and E—even the baptized Catholics among them have remained alienated from the Church.
I have a feeling that PCP2’s vision of the Philippine Church as a Church of the Poor was, to a large extent what it said it really was—still a vision, not yet a reality. Well, to cut the long story short, I told Doc Tony that I was willing to draft the Pastoral on Filipino Spirituality only if I could be allowed to do it in a Filipino language, either in Kapampangan or Tagalog. He smiled and said, “Give me some time to discuss it with Archbishop Legaspi.” I also smiled and said to myself, “Good, I’m off the hook.”
To my surprise, one week later, he called me up to say that my proposal had been approved. “If possible,” he said, “please write it in Tagalog, because very few would understand it in Kapampangan, and I will take care of having it translated into English. And so I drafted the said pastoral and entitled it, LANDAS NG PAGPAPAKABANAL PARA SA PILIPINO.
I was surprised to hear later on from some priests, former students of mine from the Visayas and Mindanao, that they did not even feel the need to translate it into Cebuano because they understood the Filipino quite well. I also heard from some parish priests and school directors that they used it as a kind of manual for spiritual formation in parishes and schools. It did not land in the headline news, it did not become controversial, but it reverberated among the grassroots, I heard, and was even used by the BECs. But that was about the only time that a pastoral was drafted in a Filipino language. It did not succeed in setting a linguistic trend in the drafting of other pastorals.
Perhaps it’s about time that we took more seriously the consequences of our cultural distance from the majority in our Philippine society. We must humbly admit that our spiritual and moral influence on them has become very minimal. One of the best proofs for this is the fact that the present populist government is very successful in alienating us from our own people, in stoking deep-seated resentments among those in the D and E strata, against those in the A,B, & C, and to identify us Church leaders with the ABC because seminary formation has given us the same level of education.
Knowing our own vulnerabilities as Church leaders, the populist leader now takes advantage of every opportunity to question our credibility, to call us a bunch of hypocrites, to accuse us of playing politics, and to insult the God we proclaim with cuss words that entertain people—most of whom belong to our Catholic faithful. He has succeeded in caricaturing us as elitists, as pharisaical leaders who don’t walk our talk, as shepherds who don’t smell like our sheep. His social media army of trolls have succeeded in amplifying his message while keeping him high in terms of popularity in the surveys.
We know we are sinners, we have our own share of human failures and weaknesses, but we also know these caricatures are what they are—caricatures. Meaning, “distorted representations in a way that exaggerates and oversimplifies,” with the objective of insulting or making fun of those being caricatured. Caricaturing perceived enemies seems to be very consistent with the typical demagoguery that has given rise to populist governments all over the world, the kind of worldview that has found a perfect tool in the modern social media. All they need to do is to hire armies of IT people, whose job is to create fake accounts that would efficiently amplify their so-called “alternative narratives.”
And mind you, they are very successful at it. They have mastered the technique of boosting their fake news, bullying truth-tellers by blasting their comment boxes with invectives and intimidations. They can spread their falsehoods with the speed of light, and make their videos go viral on Tik-Tok, Instagram, WhatsApp, Twitter and Fb.
People, especially the young, don’t even know anymore that many of those whom they interact with in the social media are not real people but mostly virtual accounts run by a handful of trolls, who dominate the cyberspace through AI (artificial intelligence), and, in effect, are able to control public opinion about almost anything.
Most social media users don’t even know that what they post on any social media platform does not belong to them. The cloud of data belongs to the owners of those platforms who have the exclusive right to sell these data and earn billions from companies that also earn billions by using them to control people’s product preferences, their choices of entertainment, their sexual preferences and their addictions through AI-generated algorithms in the information ecosystem.
Worse yet, they sell their data to governments and aspiring politicians who have succeeded in making fascism, dictatorship and authoritarianism fashionable all over again. They go by the principle made popular by Joseph Goebbels, whom Hitler appointed Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda in the German Reich. He said, “A lie told once remains a lie. But a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.” And that “truth” is now called the ALTERNATIVE NARRATIVE.
That is how the present populist government in our country rose into power. Pope Francis has spoken very often about the evils of populism in his encyclical Fratelli Tutti. His words ring true in our own setting, especially now that we are witnessing how the family of our present populist leader is entering into a convenient deal with the family of the late dictator for political expediency, in a kind of symbiosis of power or a mutually beneficial intermarriage of political dynasties. And apparently they are leading in the surveys, as you will hear later from our invited resource persons. Apparently more than 60 percent of our Catholic faithful will support them, according to reliable survey results.
I think they are having their heyday partly because we have conveniently avoided politics and have kept the social teachings of the Church about the politics of the common good practically unknown to our faithful. As a consequence, our laity have tended to be more clericalistic than clerics themselves. They keep their involvement to a bare minimum, such as through non-partisan organizations for election monitoring like PPCRV (which are, no doubt, also important).
Look, even our Sangguniang Laiko leaders cannot seem to make up their minds on whether or not their leadership body should go to the point of supporting candidates who represent values close to the Gospel and the social teachings of the Church. Ironically, it is those who support the candidates who steal, lie and kill, who tend to be more aggressive about insisting on “non-partisanship”, which, to them means keeping the Church in a pure state of neutrality. They are the ones who love to invoke against us the principle of “separation of Church and State”, as they understand it—not as the Philippine Constitution actually says it.
They remind me of Pontius Pilate and what he did when he asked Jesus in Jn 8:31, “WHAT IS TRUTH?” Pilate somehow knew that the accusations against Jesus were unfounded. That was why he felt the need to conduct his own investigation on the matter. Later in the Gospel, we are told that he had found no guilt in the accused. But in the end, what did he do? He “washed his hands” and chose to stay “neutral” because he did not have the courage to uphold the truth.
In Jn 8:31-32, Jesus said, “If you remain in my word, you will truly be my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” I remember how the late Jesuit Fr. Guido Arguelles used to paraphrase those words of Jesus. He said, “The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable.”
Dear brother bishops of the Philippines, I know we feel like a David before a Goliath who is armed from head to toe. I am sure like the terrified army led by Saul, we are inclined to say “He is so big, how can we fight this giant?” With just a slingshot and some pebbles, and a lot of faith in the God who had seen in him the heart of a good shepherd who was fearless when it came to defending his flocks from predators, David saw things differently. He said, “He is so big, I cannot possibly miss.” The Goliath that I am referring to is Satan, no other. Only Satan is our enemy; he fights his battle with lies. Only Christ is our General; He fights his battle with the armor of truth.
In Ephesians 6:10-17,Paul gives us some tips on how to fight the spiritual battle; by drawing our strength only “from the Lord and from his mighty power.” He also says, “Stand fast with your loins girded in truth, clothed with righteousness as a breastplate, and your feet shod in readiness for the gospel of peace. In all circumstances, hold faith as a shield, to quench all [the] flaming arrows of the evil one. And take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.”
May the Holy Spirit breathe upon us as we begin this plenary assembly. Thank you.
In the celebration of 2022 Week of Prayer for Christian Unity (January 18-25), the Episcopal Commission on Ecumenical Affairs (ECEA) is sharing the following:
1. The General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity released what I could describe as a “short but sweet” prayer linking synodality and ecumenism as we celebrate the Week of Prayer. The prayer goes:
Heavenly Father, As the Magi journeyed towards Bethlehem led by the star, so by Your heavenly light, guide the Catholic Church to walk together with all Christians during this time of synod. As the Magi were united in their worship of Christ, lead us closer to Your Son and so to one another, so that we become a sign of the unity that You desire for Your Church and the whole creation. We ask this through Christ, our Lord. Amen.
2. CBCP-NCCP Unity Statement FOR 2022 WPCU, attached.
Ordinary Catholics and church social action groups pull out all the stops to help the needy overcome Typhoon Rai
UCA News Joseph Peter Calleja Manila | January 14, 2022
Residents carry bottled water given as aid from a non-governmental organisation in Burgos town, Siargao island, on Jan. 5, weeks after Typhoon Rai devastated the island. (Photo: AFP)
Eighty-eight-year-old Anastasia Baroro begged the media to send out her short message.
“Please, air this so my children can watch it,” she told a reporter covering the aftermath of Typhoon Rai in Cebu in the central Philippines.
He expected to hear her lament how the typhoon had turned her bamboo hut into pieces, destroying the small store that sustained her.
Surprisingly, Anastasia began her statement with these words, “My children, I thank God because I am still alive. Do not worry about me because I am still here. I will see you soon.”
Instead of cursing the world, the old woman felt heaven had given her another chance to live despite her home collapsing around her. Her only wish was to see her daughter who lives in another town.
When Typhoon Rai struck the Philippines on Dec. 16 last year, it destroyed roads, bridges and infrastructure amounting to a conservative estimate of 28 billion pesos (US$560 million).
Even if they have money, there’s nothing to buy because stores were closed or destroyed
It also killed 407 people, injured more than 1,140 and wiped out thousands of homes on the islands of Cebu, Siargao, Surigao and elsewhere, leaving residents with no electricity or potable water.
The Catholic Church’s social arm Caritas and the Jesuit-run Tanging Yaman Foundation were among the first organizations to make their presence felt among people on the ground.
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines, meanwhile, appealed for help for typhoon victims.
In a Dec. 19 letter, Caritas chief Bishop Kolin Bagaforo called on all dioceses in the Philippines to support victims not only in terms of material goods but through prayer.
The bishops declared Dec. 25 and 26 as national days of prayer for families and communities affected by the mega storm, one of the most powerful to hit the country.
There were second collections in parishes across the country for dioceses worst hit by the typhoon.
Cagayan de Oro Archdiocese, the Apostolic Vicariate of Puerto Prinsesa in Palawan, and Dumaguete Diocese were among the beneficiaries of Caritas’ attempt to cushion the storm’s blow.
Caritas’ executive secretary Father Antonio Labiao told the press in December that people needed shelter materials, food, water and medicines urgently.
Pope Francis meets with diplomats accredited to the Holy See at the Vatican’s Hall of Blessings. Vatican Media.
CNA Staff Vatican City | Jan 10, 2022
Pope Francis lamented “cancel culture” in an address to diplomats at the Vatican on Monday.
Delivering his annual “state of the world” address on Jan. 10, the pope said that international organizations were increasingly pursuing “divisive” agendas at odds with the longstanding values of many countries.
“Not infrequently, the center of interest has shifted to matters that by their divisive nature do not strictly belong to the aims of the organization,” he said.
“As a result, agendas are increasingly dictated by a mindset that rejects the natural foundations of humanity and the cultural roots that constitute the identity of many peoples.”
“As I have stated on other occasions, I consider this a form of ideological colonization, one that leaves no room for freedom of expression and is now taking the form of the ‘cancel culture’ invading many circles and public institutions.”
While the pope delivered his address in Italian, he said the phrase “cancel culture” in English.
Speaking in the Apostolic Palace’s Hall of Blessings, the pope told representatives of the 183 states that have diplomatic relations with the Holy See that the “mindset” currently prevailing in international institutions ended up “canceling all sense of identity” while claiming to defend diversity.
He said: “A kind of dangerous ‘one-track thinking’ is taking shape, one constrained to deny history or, worse yet, to rewrite it in terms of present-day categories, whereas any historical situation must be interpreted in accordance with a hermeneutics of that particular time, not that of today.”
He went on: “Multilateral diplomacy is thus called to be truly inclusive, not canceling but cherishing the differences and sensibilities that have historically marked various peoples.”
“In this way, it will regain credibility and effectiveness in facing the challenges to come, which will require humanity to join together as one great family that, starting from different viewpoints, should prove capable of finding common solutions for the good of all.”
The pope did not offer any examples of the mindset he was deploring. But last month, he criticized a withdrawn document discouraging staff at the European Commission, the executive branch of the European Union, from using the word “Christmas.”
“The European Union must take in hand the ideals of the founding fathers, which were ideals of unity, of greatness, and be careful not to take the path of ideological colonization,” the pope told reporters as he flew home from Greece in December.
During the same in-flight press conference, he said it was vital to interpret a landmark report on abuse in the French Catholic Church over the past 70 years “with the hermeneutic of the time and not with ours.”
In his wide-ranging address, which lasted around 40 minutes, the pope reviewed his diplomatic activities in 2021 and touched on major global themes such as the coronavirus pandemic, immigration, climate change, and nuclear arms.
The live-streamed event in the gilded Hall of Blessings began with an address to Pope Francis by George Poulides, Cyprus’ ambassador to the Holy See and dean of the diplomatic corps.
“Thank you, Holy Father, for your untiring work, which is a source of hope for many peoples, for many men and women,” he said.
Speaking beneath a large tapestry depicting the nativity of Christ, the pope strongly endorsed COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.
“Sadly, we are finding increasingly that we live in a world of strong ideological divides,” he said. “Frequently people let themselves be influenced by the ideology of the moment, often bolstered by baseless information or poorly documented facts.”
“Every ideological statement severs the bond of human reason with the objective reality of things. The pandemic, on the other hand, urges us to adopt a sort of ‘reality therapy’ that makes us confront the problem head-on and adopt suitable remedies to resolve it.”
“Vaccines are not a magical means of healing, yet surely they represent, in addition to other treatments that need to be developed, the most reasonable solution for the prevention of the disease.”
The pope criticized what he called a “lack of resolute decision-making and clear communication” by the authorities amid the pandemic, which he said had created “a ‘social relativism’ detrimental to harmony and unity.”
He told the diplomats, who wore formal uniforms and face coverings, that he hoped to see renewed efforts so that “the entire world population can have equal access to essential medical care and vaccines.”
After recalling his 2021 trips to Iraq, Hungary, and Slovakia, the pope highlighted his meeting with migrants on the Greek island of Lesbos on Dec. 5.
“I am aware of the difficulties that some states encounter in the face of a large influx of people. No one can be asked to do what is impossible for them, yet there is a clear difference between accepting, albeit in a limited way, and rejecting completely,” he said.
He added that international indifference made migrants easy prey for traffickers.
“Sadly, we must also note that migrants are themselves often turned into a weapon of political blackmail, becoming a sort of ‘bargaining commodity’ that deprives them of their dignity,” he said.
The pope did not mention any countries by name, but the European Union recently accused Belarus of trying to help thousands of mainly Middle Eastern migrants to enter the EU via the country’s border with Poland.
The 85-year-old pontiff also spoke about what he called “massive migration movements” in the Americas, concentrated on the border between Mexico and the United States.
“Many of those migrants are Haitians fleeing the tragedies that have struck their country in recent years,” he noted, underlining the need for international cooperation on migration.
Turning to the environment, the pope expressed some disappointment at the outcome of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Scotland.
“At the recent COP26 in Glasgow, several steps were made in the right direction, even though they were rather weak in light of the gravity of the problem to be faced,” he said.
“The road to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement is complex and appears to be long, while the time at our disposal is shorter and shorter.”
“Much still remains to be done, and so 2022 will be another fundamental year for verifying to what extent and in what ways the decisions taken in Glasgow can and should be further consolidated in view of COP27, planned for Egypt next November.”
The pope then gave a brief overview of the world’s hotspots, beginning with Syria, where he said that the general population should not be penalized by sanctions as poverty stalks the country after more than 10 years of war.
He described the conflict in Yemen, which has claimed an estimated 377,000 lives since 2014, as “a human tragedy that has gone on for years, silently, far from the spotlight of the media and with a certain indifference on the part of the international community.”
“In the past year, no steps forward were made in the peace process between Israel and Palestine,” he noted, calling for direct talks.
Cardinal Jose Advincula celebrates Mass on the Feast of the Black Nazarane at the Quiapo Church in Manila on Sunday, Jan. 9. Photo from Quiapo Church
By CBCP News January 9, 2022
Cardinal Jose Advincula celebrated his first Feast of the Black Nazarene Mass as Manila archbishop on Sunday in an almost empty Quiapo Church, urging the devotees “to help each other live with dignity” in the face of crisis.
For the first time in recent memory, public Masses inside the minor basilica were banned for the feast amidst the sharp spike in coronavirus cases.
Instead, more than a dozen Masses were held in the church throughout the day and were livestreamed through the archdiocese’s different online platforms.
In his homily to devotees following the Mass on television and online, he exhorted them to rise from the challenges, turn away from sin and live as God’s children.
“Let us reach out to our brothers and sisters, especially those who are struggling today,” Advincula said in Filipino.
According to him, God does not want the people’s dignity to be trampled on. “He does not want us to be destroyed by sin and wickedness,” he said.
“Let us also stand to lead one another to holiness and prosperity in life,” Advincula said.
This year’s celebration also marked the second time after last year that the famous procession of the revered image of the Black Nazarene was called off since World War II.
The cardinal assured the devotees who were saddened by the restrictions that the Black Nazarene is still with them.
“Although not all of us can visit here in Quiapo, the Señor himself visits our families and homes,” Advincula said.
“Even if we can’t get close to his image, He is the one who is approaching us now. He enters our hearts and strengthens our hope. He intercedes with us and binds us in love,” he said.
The Manila archbishop also assured the millions of devotees that Jesus knows what they are going through, especially during this pandemic.
“He feels for us and he sympathizes with us,” he added.
New legislation carries up to 12 years in prison for those who flout the law
UCANews | Joseph Peter Calleja Manila | January 07, 2022
A young actress takes part in a campaign by Amnesty International to denounce child marriage in October 2016 in Rome, Italy. (Photo: AFP)
The Philippines has enacted a new law banning child marriage and cohabitation with minors.
It is hoped the bill, signed by President Rodrigo Duterte on Jan. 6, will end practices that see one in six Filipino girls married before they turn 18.
Children’s rights advocates welcomed the new law, saying it marked a major advancement in protecting young girls.
“This is a major victory in our campaign to end child marriage in the Philippines. This law will help protect children, especially young girls, and hopefully change the trajectory of their lives,” the law’s author, lawmaker Bernadette Herrera, told The Inquirer newspaper on Jan. 6.
The new law not only criminalizes marrying someone under 18 years old but also outlaws cohabitating with a minor as husband and wife and punishes those who facilitate such unions.
It carries a jail term up to 12 years and a fine of at least 40,000 pesos (US$800).
Thus, the law views that child marriage as a practice is a form of child abuse because it violates and degrades the dignity of our children
The lifting of the ban on copper, gold, silver, and complex ores open-pit mining is another blow against an already gasping state of our Philippine environment. To this government, and particularly the DENR, the many incidents of landslides and flooding wrought by Typhoon Odette, seem not enough reminder that a big shift in policies and development projects would give due protection to the environment is imperative now, more than ever.
For PMPI, the lifting of the ban signals yet another flip-flopping of the DENR, giving high priority to the opening-up of mining operations for income or revenues and on the one hand public propaganda by President Duterte of ensuring the protection of the environment against mining industries which destroys and earn big bucks from it. The DENR as a government agency’s task is not only to manage the use of our natural resources but also its conservation and protection. But clearly, the lifting of the ban shows the biased of DENR to favor the destruction of watersheds, forests, culture, and biodiversity – under a skewed and vague assumption that these are but necessary trade-offs for a better future.
PMPI and our Sites of Struggles (SoS), partner communities struggling against mining operations across the archipelago strongly believe that mining is not and can never be a strategic vehicle towards economic recovery. The mining sector’s historical performance in terms of revenue and job generation was never significant – an average of 205,000 jobs per year and less than 2% contribution of the total national revenue (Mines and Geosciences Bureau and Bureau of Internal Revenue data).
Our partner communities affected by mining operations are living testimonies of the lies peddled by this government and the mining corporations on the so called “Sustainable Mining” and “Globally accepted method” on mining operations. The islands of Manicani in Guiuan, Eastern Samar and Rapu-Rapu in Albay bear the scars of mining corporations’ bad practices and the DENR’s incapacity to enforce existing environmental safety standards and policies. Both islands have yet to be rehabilitated to this day.
Further, PMPI does not share the glossy assumption of DENR and MGB that stiffer monitoring and stricter implementation of environmental safety standards will be imposed as part of the new DAO 2021-14. DENR. From our communities’ experience, MGB does not have the capacity to monitor all fifty (50) active mining operations in the country, more so, additional mining operations once the lifting of the moratorium on Open-pit mining takes effect.
Threats to indigenous peoples’ ancestral domains, lowland communities, irrigators, fishers, and farmers in the four provinces of South Cotabato continue. The conglomerate Indophil and Sagittarius Mining Corporation is aggressively pushing to dismantle the Environmental Code of the province to finally start the biggest copper and gold mining in Asia. But incidentally, the projected trade-offs are the destruction of the Marbel-Buluan Watershed, the irrigation systems of the productive, jobs and revenue-generating agriculture of the Province of South Cotabato.
Our CBCP General Secretariat office just got the text below from Bishop Antonieto Cabajog of Surigao. (The all-caps text could only indicate a sense of urgency and a cry for help for the people of Surigao.)
Perhaps instead of spending a lot on lavish Christmas parties and exchange gifts, we can put together whatever we can and contribute it to relief operations.
His Excellency Pablo Virgilio David Bishop of Kalookan CBCP President
Aerial picture shows damage caused by Super Typhoon Rai after the storm crossed over Surigao City in Surigao del Norte province of Philippines.–AFP
Typhoon Odette manifested its super- strength starting a few minutes past one o’clock in the afternoon of December 16, 2o21. It gradually unleashed more strength and peaked between 3:00-4:00 p.m. Blinding torrential rains and howling winds no man could take standing up hammered us for more than three hours.
Not only were trees uprooted and rooftops ripped from homes battered like doll-houses, electric power and all forms of communication were cut off literally isolating us from the rest of the world. It was only in the afternoon of Dec. 18 were we able to clear fallen trees and debris around the bishop’s house and allowing cautious opportunity to move around areas of the city cleared enough of fallen trees, landslides, fallen electric posts, G.I. sheets crumpled like papers, wires and other debris. The cathedral and rectory suffered sizeable damaged. Two parish churches in the city suffered broken glasses, blown roofings and flooding.
Never in my entire life have I encountered such typhoon to say “super” is an understatement. Throughout the ordeal we had the blessed sacrament exposed and the statue of Our Lady of Fatima on one side.
As of this writing communications from all parishes are yet to be received. This report is written on my way to Butuan City to post this report.
Please continue to pray for the Diocese of Surigao.
Mainland parishes seem to have suffered lesser damage but Surigao City. Aside from the city and surrounding areas Siargao Island and Dinagat province are worst hit with unofficial reports of many casualties.
Food and water are priority needs in badly hit areas. Inspite of all these the strong faith of the people stands out as their pillar of comfort and support.
We thank all of you for your prayers as we move on in synodality and celebrate Christmas in this “new normal”. “Cum Infirmor Potens Sum.”
+Antonieto D. Cabajog, D.D. Bishop of Surigao Dec. 20, 2021
